David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Legal Theory 14 (3):193–217 (2008)
In this article I criticize a theory of political obligation recently put forward by Christopher Wellman. Wellman's “samaritan theory” grounds both state legitimacy and political obligation in a natural duty to help people in need when this can be done at no unreasonable cost. I argue that this view is not able to account for some important features of the relation between state and citizens that Wellman himself seems to value. My conclusion is that the samaritan theory can only be accepted if we are ready to give up either the traditional notion of political obligation as a prima facie duty valid for every citizen, or the current view of the relationships that should exist between states, citizens and foreigners (the view according to which states should have special concerns for their own citizens).
|Keywords||Political Obligation Legitimacy Samaritanism Particularity Global Justice Partiality Christopher H. Wellman Fair-play|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Candice Delmas (2014). Samaritanism and Civil Disobedience. Res Publica 20 (3):295-313.
Similar books and articles
Pavlos Eleftheriadis (forthcoming). Citizenship and Obligation. In Julie Dickson & Pavlos Eleftheriadis (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law. Oxford University Press
Dorota Mokrosińska (2013). What is Political About Political Obligation? A Neglected Lesson From Consent Theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):88-108.
George Klosko (2005). Political Obligations. OUP Oxford.
Christopher Heath Wellman (2005). Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? Cambridge University Press.
Christopher H. Wellman (2004). Political Obligation and the Particularity Requirement. Legal Theory 10 (2):97-115.
Christopher H. Wellman (1996). Liberalism, Samaritanism, and Political Legitimacy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (3):211–237.
Jason Wyckoff (2010). The Inseparability Thesis. Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (1):51-59.
P. J. Markie (2009). Political Obligation and the Particularity Problem. Ratio 22 (3):322-337.
George Klosko (2003). Samaritanism and Political Obligation: A Response to Christopher Wellman's “Liberal Theory of Political Obligation”. Ethics 113 (4):835-840.
Philip Soper (2002). The Ethics of Deference: Learning From Law's Morals. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-10-31
Total downloads70 ( #48,561 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?