Can We Be Self-Deceived about What We Believe? Self-Knowledge, Self-Deception, and Rational Agency

European Journal of Philosophy 20 (S1):E1-E25 (2012)
Abstract: This paper considers the question of whether it is possible to be mistaken about the content of our first-order intentional states. For proponents of the rational agency model of self-knowledge, such failures might seem very difficult to explain. On this model, the authority of self-knowledge is not based on inference from evidence, but rather originates in our capacity, as rational agents, to shape our beliefs and other intentional states. To believe that one believes that p, on this view, constitutes one's belief that p and so self-knowledge involves a constitutive relation between first- and second-order beliefs. If this is true, it is hard to see how those second-order beliefs could ever be false.I develop two counter-examples which show that despite the constitutive relation between first- and second-order beliefs in standard cases of self-knowledge, it is possible to be mistaken, and even self-deceived, about the content of one's own beliefs. These counter-examples do not show that the rational agency model is mistaken—rather, they show that the possibility of estrangement from one's own mental life means that, even within the rational agency model, it is possible to have false second-order beliefs about the content of one's first-order beliefs. The authority of self-knowledge does not entail that to believe that one believes that p suffices to make it the case that one believes that p.
Keywords Self-knowledge  Self-deception  First-Person Authority  agency
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00469.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,720
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
G. E. M. Anscombe (1957). Intention. Harvard University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Baron Reed (2010). Self-Knowledge and Rationality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (1):164-181.
Richard Holton (2001). What is the Role of the Self in Self-Deception? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):53-69.
Jordi Fernández (2005). Self-Knowledge, Rationality and Moore's Paradox. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):533-556.
William Hirstein (2000). Self-Deception and Confabulation. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):S418-S429.
Ralph Wedgwood (2011). Primitively Rational Belief-Forming Processes. In Andrew Reisner & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (eds.), Reasons for Belief. Cambridge University Press 180--200.
D. Patten (2003). How Do We Deceive Ourselves. Philosophical Psychology 16 (2):229-247.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

94 ( #47,349 of 1,937,360 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

12 ( #45,256 of 1,937,360 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.