David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
T. Dougherty (ed.)
Oxford University Press (2011)
Few concepts have been considered as essential to the theory of knowledge and rational belief as that of evidence. The simplest theory which accounts for this is evidentialism, the view that epistemic justification for belief--the kind of justification typically taken to be required for knowledge--is determined solely by considerations pertaining to one's evidence. In this ground-breaking book, leading epistemologists from across the spectrum challenge and refine evidentialism, sometimes suggesting that it needs to be expanded in quite surprising directions. Following this, the twin pillars of contemporary evidentialism--Earl Conee and Richard Feldman--respond to each essay. This engaging debate covers a vast number of issues, and will illuminate and inform
|Keywords||Evidence Knowledge, Theory of|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$57.01 used (37% off) $68.59 new (24% off) $78.58 direct from Amazon (13% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BD161.E95 2011|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
Alvin I. Goldman, Toward a Synthesis of Reliabilism and Evidentialism? Or: Evidentialism's Troubles, Reliabilism's Rescue Package.
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Luis Rosa (2014). Justification and Cognitive Algorithms. Philosophia 42 (2):503-515.
Jeremy Wanderer & Leo Townsend (2013). Is It Rational to Trust? Philosophy Compass 8 (1):1-14.
Similar books and articles
Earl Conee & Richard Feldman (2004). Evidentialism. Oxford University Press.
Allen Wood (2008). The Duty to Believe According to the Evidence. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63 (1/3):7 - 24.
Earl Brink Conee (2004). Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Jason Baehr (2009). Evidentialism, Vice, and Virtue. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (3):545-567.
Richard Feldman (2009). Evidentialism, Higher-Order Evidence, and Disagreement. Episteme 6 (3):294-312.
Scott F. Aikin (2006). Modest Evidentialism. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (3):327-343.
Andrew Reisner (2007). Evidentialism and the Numbers Game. Theoria 73 (4):304-316.
John Greco (2011). Evidentialism About Knowledge. In Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford University Press.
Todd Long (2012). Mentalist Evidentialism Vindicated (and a Super-Blooper Epistemic Design Problem for Proper Function Justification). Philosophical Studies 157 (2):251-266.
Patrick Rysiew (2011). Making It Evident: Evidence and Evidentness, Justification, and Belief. In Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford University Press.
Guy Axtell (2011). From Internalist Evidentialism to Virtue Responsibilism. In Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tommaso Piazza (2009). Evidentialism and the Problem of Stored Beliefs. Philosophical Studies 145 (2):311 - 324.
L. Leydon-Hardy (2012). Evidentialism and its Discontents * Edited by Trent Dougherty. Analysis 72 (4):852-854.
John Zeis (2010). Evidentialism Versus Faith. Social Epistemology 24 (1):1 – 13.
Alvin I. Goldman (2011). Toward a Synthesis of Reliabilism and Evidentialism? Or: Evidentialism's Troubles, Reliabilism's Rescue Package. In Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-04-13
Total downloads41 ( #48,933 of 1,410,540 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #22,859 of 1,410,540 )
How can I increase my downloads?