Extraordinary Evil or Common Malevolence? Evaluating the Jewish Holocaust

Journal of Applied Philosophy 3 (2):167-181 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay considers and rejects the hypothesis of Fackenheim, Wiesel and others that the Jewish Holocaust contains some qualitatively or quantitatively distinct moral evil. The Holocaust was not qualitatively distinct because the intentions and vices of the mass murderer are qualitatively indistinguishable from the intentions and vices of the common murderer. The Holocaust was not quantitatively distinct either because the sum of the evils of the Holocaust is quantitatively indistinguishable from six million randomly selected individual murders or because the notion of a ‘sum’ of moral evils is conceptually incoherent

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Levinas’s Philosophy a Response to the Holocaust?Joshua Shaw - 2010 - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 18 (2):121-146.
Evil and suffering in Jewish philosophy.Oliver Leaman - 1995 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jewish Ethics after the Holocaust.Michael L. Morgan - 1984 - Journal of Religious Ethics 12 (2):256 - 277.
Epistemic malevolence.Jason Baehr - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (1-2):189-213.
The myth of evil: demonizing the enemy.Phillip Cole - 2006 - Westport, Conn.: Praeger.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
26 (#592,813)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas Lackey
Baruch College (CUNY)

Citations of this work

Genocide and crimes against humanity: Dispelling the conceptual fog.Andrew Altman - 2012 - Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):280-308.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references