Managing intentions: The end-of-life administration of analgesics and sedatives, and the possibility of slow euthanasia
Bioethics 22 (7):388-396 (2008)
| Abstract | There has been much debate regarding the 'double-effect' of sedatives and analgesics administered at the end-of-life, and the possibility that health professionals using these drugs are performing 'slow euthanasia.' On the one hand analgesics and sedatives can do much to relieve suffering in the terminally ill. On the other hand, they can hasten death. According to a standard view, the administration of analgesics and sedatives amounts to euthanasia when the drugs are given with an intention to hasten death. In this paper we report a small qualitative study based on interviews with 8 Australian general physicians regarding their understanding of intention in the context of questions about voluntary euthanasia, assisted suicide and particularly the use of analgesic and sedative infusions (including the possibility of voluntary or non-voluntary 'slow euthanasia'). We found a striking ambiguity and uncertainty regarding intentions amongst doctors interviewed. Some were explicit in describing a 'grey' area between palliation and euthanasia, or a continuum between the two. Not one of the respondents was consistent in distinguishing between a foreseen death and an intended death. A major theme was that 'slow euthanasia' may be more psychologically acceptable to doctors than active voluntary euthanasia by bolus injection, partly because the former would usually only result in a small loss of 'time' for patients already very close to death, but also because of the desirable ambiguities surrounding causation and intention when an infusion of analgesics and sedatives is used. The empirical and philosophical implications of these findings are discussed. | |||||||||
| Keywords | ||||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRaphael Cohen-Almagor (2002). Non-Voluntary and Involuntary Euthanasia in the Netherlands: Dutch Perspectives. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (5):161-179.
Raphael Cohen-Almagor (2002). Non-Voluntary and Involuntary Euthanasia in the Netherlands. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):161-179.
Craig Paterson (2009). A History of Ideas Concerning the Morality of Suicide, Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia. In Rajitha Tadikonda (ed.), Physician Assisted Euthanasia. Icfai University Press.
Hazel Biggs (2001). Euthanasia, Death with Dignity, and the Law. Hart Publishing.
David Shaw (2007). The Body as Unwarranted Life Support: A New Perspective on Euthanasia. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (9):519-521.
Mary Warnock (2008). Easeful Death: Is There a Case for Assisted Dying? Oxford University Press.
Margaret Otlowski (1997). Voluntary Euthanasia and the Common Law. Clarendon Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads26 ( #47,662 of 549,084 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,084 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
