Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):41-42 (2001)
|Abstract||Although the model proposed by Thelen and co-authors provides a detailed explanation for the processes underlying reaching, many aspects of it are highly speculative. One of the reasons for this is our lack of knowledge about transformation of a hand movement plan into joint movements. The leading joint hypothesis (LJH) allows us to partially fill in this gap. The LJH offers a possible explanation for the formation of movement and how it may be represented in memory. Our explanation converges with the dynamic model described in the target article.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Barbara Montero (2010). Does Bodily Awareness Interfere with Highly Skilled Movement? Inquiry 53 (2):105 – 122.
Arne Naess (1984). A Defence of the Deep Ecology Movement. Environmental Ethics 6 (3):265-270.
David Morris (2002). Touching Intelligence. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 29 (149-162).
Paul Souriau (1983). The Aesthetics of Movement. University of Massachusetts Press.
Cécile Beauvillain & Pierre Pouget (2003). How Can Selection-for-Perception Be Decoupled From Selection-for-Action? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):478-479.
Tom Burke (2010). Empiricism, Pragmatism, and the Settlement Movement. The Pluralist 5 (3):73-88.
Peggy J. Parks (2012). The Green Movement. Referencepoint Press.
Maurizio Gentilucci & Sergio Chieffi (2004). How Are Cognition and Movement Control Related to Each Other? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):36-37.
Valérie Gaveau & Michel Desmurget (2004). Do Movement Planning and Control Represent Independent Modules? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):35-36.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #292,723 of 738,633 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?