David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 184 (1):109-114 (2012)
A recent argument by Hawthorne and Lasonen-Aarnio purports to show that we can uphold the principle that competently forming conjunctions is a knowledge-preserving operation only at the cost of a rampant skepticism about the future. A key premise of their argument is that, in light of quantum-mechanical considerations, future contingents never quite have chance 1 of being true. We argue, by drawing attention to the order of magnitude of the relevant quantum probabilities, that the skeptical threat of Hawthorne and Lasonen-Aarnio’s argument is illusory
|Keywords||Quantum probabilities Conjunction principle Skepticism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Timothy Williamson (2000). Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford University Press.
David Christensen (2004). Putting Logic in its Place: Formal Constraints on Rational Belief. Oxford University Press.
Igor Douven (2006). Assertion, Knowledge, and Rational Credibility. Philosophical Review 115 (4):449-485.
Richard Foley (1992). The Epistemology of Belief and the Epistemology of Degrees of Belief. American Philosophical Quarterly 29 (2):111 - 124.
David C. Makinson (1965). The Paradox of the Preface. Analysis 25 (6):205-207.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lefteris Farmakis (2008). Is the Subjective Interpretation of Quantum Probabilities Really Inconsistent? Theoria 23 (2):163-173.
Chuang Liu (1994). The Aharonov-Bohm Effect and the Reality of Wave Packets. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):977-1000.
Don N. Page (1996). Sensible Quantum Mechanics: Are Probabilities Only in the Mind? International Journal of Modern Physics D 5:583-96.
Milan Cirkovic (2006). Is Quantum Suicide Painless? On an Apparent Violation of the Principal Principle. Foundations of Science 11 (3):287-296.
Milan M. Ćirković (2006). Is Quantum Suicide Painless? On an Apparent Violation of the Principal Principle. Foundations of Science 11 (3):287-296.
Patrick Suppes (1966). The Probabilistic Argument for a Non-Classical Logic of Quantum Mechanics. Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):14-21.
Added to index2009-12-05
Total downloads91 ( #44,049 of 1,793,158 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #344,170 of 1,793,158 )
How can I increase my downloads?