Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):411-422 (2004)
|Abstract||Adopting meta-level Free Will Subjectivism is one among several ways to maintain that persons never experience moral freedom in their choices. The other ways of arguing against moral freedom I consider are presented by Saul Smilansky, Ted Honderich, Bruce Waller, Galen Strawson, and Derk Pereboom. In this paper, without arguing for the acceptance of free will subjectivism, I argue that subjectivism has some moral and theoretical advantages over its kindred theories|
|Keywords||Ethics Free Will Freedom Morality Subjectivism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jonathan Cohen (2001). Subjectivism, Physicalism or None of the Above? Comments on Ross's The Location Problem for Color Subjectivism. Consciousness and Cognition 10 (1):94-104.
Peter W. Ross (2001). The Location Problem for Color Subjectivism. Consciousness and Cognition 10 (1):42-58.
By Ira M. Schnall (2004). Philosophy of Language and Meta-Ethics. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (217):587–594.
Roger White (2007). Epistemic Subjectivism. Episteme 4 (1):115-129.
John Martin Fischer (2004). Free Will and Moral Responsibility. In D. Copps (ed.), Handbook on Ethical Theory. Oxford University Press.
Sebastian Köhler (2012). Expressivism, Subjectivism and Moral Disagreement. Thought 1 (1):71-78.
Richard Double (2002). Metaethics, Metaphilosophy, and Free Will Subjectivism. In Robert H. Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Galen Strawson (1986/2010). Freedom and Belief. Oxford University Press.
Richard Double (1996). Metaphilosophy and Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads63 ( #17,875 of 739,764 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #14,948 of 739,764 )
How can I increase my downloads?