David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Utilitas 2 (1):12 (1990)
David Hume, Adam Smith, Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are often viewed as contributors to or participants in a common tradition of thought roughly characterized as ‘the liberal tradition’ or the tradition of ‘bourgeois ideology’. This view, however useful it may be for polemical or proselytizing purposes, is in some important respects historiographically unsound. This is not to deny the importance of asking what twentieth-century liberals or conservatives might find in the works of, say, David Hume to support their respective ideological persuasions. It is only to insist that attempts to use selected arguments, or parts of arguments, from great eighteenth-century thinkers to shore up twentieth-century programmatic political positions must be categorically distinguished from attempts to understand what Hume, Smith, Bentham or Mill actually meant, or could imaginably have meant, to say.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
M. H. Laine & P. J. Kelly (1990). The J. S. Mill Bibliography: Recent Additions. Utilitas 2 (2):345.
Michael Quinn (2014). Bentham on Mensuration: Calculation and Moral Reasoning. Utilitas 26 (1):61-104.
Similar books and articles
Philippe Mongin & Nathalie Sigot (1999). Halévy's Bentham is Bentham. Philosophy 74 (2):271-281.
Philip Schofield (2009). Bentham: A Guide for the Perplexed. New York ;Continuum.
Per-erik Malmnäs (1994). Axiomatic Justifications of the Utility Principle: A Formal Investigation. Synthese 99 (2):233 - 249.
Fred Wilson (1983). Mill's 'Proof' of Utility and the Composition of Causes. Journal of Business Ethics 2 (2):135 - 155.
Michael S. Pritchard (2008). Justice And Resentment In Hume, Reid, And Smith. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (1):59-70.
William Sweet, Jeremy Bentham. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Wesley Cooper (2008). Decision-Value Utilitarianism. Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):39-50.
David Lyons (1991). In the Interest of the Governed: A Study in Bentham's Philosophy of Utility and Law. Oxford University Press.
G. W. Smith (1996). David Lyons, Rights, Welfare, and Mill's Moral Theory, New York, Oxford University Press, 1994, Pp. 224;Necip Fikri Alican, Mill's Principle of Utility: A Defense of John Stuart Mill's Notorious Proof, Amsterdam, Rodopi B.V. Editions, 1994, Pp. Xv + 240. [REVIEW] Utilitas 8 (1):127.
Everett W. Hall (1949). The "Proof" of Utility in Bentham and Mill. Ethics 60 (1):1-18.
Colin Heydt, Mill, John Stuart — A. Overview. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Paul Weirich (2010). Utility and Framing. Synthese 176 (1):83 - 103.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads50 ( #81,007 of 1,790,295 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #38,278 of 1,790,295 )
How can I increase my downloads?