Advice for Non-analytical Naturalists

In Simon Kirchin (ed.), Reading Parfit. Routledge. pp. 153-171 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that Parfit's "Triviality Objection" against some naturalistic views of normativity is not compelling. We think that once one accepts, as one should, that identity statements can be informative in virtue of their pragmatics and not only in virtue of their semantics, Parfit's case against naturalism can be overcome.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Naturalism and Triviality.Attila Tanyi - 2006 - Philosophical Writings 32 (Summer):12-31.
Why naturalism?David Copp - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (2):179-200.
Naturalism without tears.James Lenman - 2009 - Ratio 22 (1):1-18.
The Eligibility of Ethical Naturalism.Douglas Edwards - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (1):1-18.
Plantinga on the Epistemic Implications of Naturalism.David Reiter - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:141-147.
Aquinas, Finnis and Non-naturalism.Craig Paterson - 2006 - In Craig Paterson & Matthew Pugh (eds.), Analytical Thomism: Traditions in Dialogue. Ashgate.
Essays on Derek Parfit's On what matters.Jussi Suikkanen & John Cottingham (eds.) - 2009 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-19

Downloads
494 (#36,440)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Sobel
Syracuse University

Citations of this work

Normative Naturalism on Its Own Terms.Pekka Väyrynen - 2021 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 28 (3):505-530.
The Normative Property Dualism Argument.Jesse Hambly - forthcoming - The Philosophical Quarterly.
Scanlon’s modal metaphysics.Gideon Rosen - 2017 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (6):856-876.

Add more citations