Causal Loops and the Independence of Causal Facts

Philosophy of Science 68 (S3):S89-S97 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to Hugh Mellor in Real Time II, assuming the logical independence of causal facts and the ‘law of large numbers’, causal loops are impossible because if they were possible they would produce inconsistent sets of frequencies. I clarify the argument, and argue that it would be preferable to abandon the relevant independence assumption in the case of causal loops.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Causal loops and the independence of causal facts.Phil Dowe - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S89-.
Explaining causal loops.U. Meyer - 2012 - Analysis 72 (2):259-264.
On chance in causal loops.J. Berkovitz - 2001 - Mind 110 (437):1-23.
Supervenience and (non-modal) reductionism in Leibniz's philosophy of time.J. M. - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (4):793-810.
Causal independence.Y. Avishai & H. Ekstein - 1972 - Foundations of Physics 2 (4):257-270.
Time travel without causal loops.Bradley Monton - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (234):54-67.
Causal independence.Igal Kvart - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (1):96-114.
Causation in Science.James Woodward - 2016 - In Paul Humphreys (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press USA. pp. 163-184.
Stochastic independence, causal independence, and shieldability.Wolfgang Spohn - 1980 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 9 (1):73 - 99.
Causes as events and facts.Max Kistler - 1999 - Dialectica 53 (1):25–46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
30 (#502,094)

6 months
8 (#283,518)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Phil Dowe
Australian National University

References found in this work

Time’s arrow and Archimedes’ point.Huw Price - 1996 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):1093-1096.
Review of R eal Time.L. Nathan Oaklander - 1985 - Noûs 19 (1):105-111.
On chance in causal loops.J. Berkovitz - 2001 - Mind 110 (437):1-23.

Add more references