Philosophy of Science 74 (5):724–735 (2007)
|Abstract||It is claimed that unacceptable constraints on initial data are imposed by certain responses to paradoxes that threaten time travel, closed timelike curves (CTCs) and other backwards causation hypotheses. In this paper I argue against the following claims: to say “contradictions are impossible so something must prevent the paradox” commits in general to constraints on initial data, that for fixed point dynamics so-called grey state solutions explain why contradictions do not arise, and the latter have been proved to avoid constraints on initial data. †To contact the author, please write to: Philosophy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Douglas N. Kutach (2003). Time Travel and Consistency Constraints. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1098-1113.
Tim Maudlin (1990). Time-Travel and Topology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:303 - 315.
Phil Dowe (2009). Would‐Cause Semantics. Philosophy of Science 76 (5).
Dan Klein & Christopher D. Manning, From Instance-Level Constraints to Space-Level Constraints: Making the Most of Prior Knowledge in Data Clustering.
Bradley Monton (2003). Presentists Can Believe in Closed Timelike Curves. Analysis 63 (3):199–202.
John Earman, Christopher Smeenk & Christian Wüthrich (2009). Do the Laws of Physics Forbid the Operation of Time Machines? Synthese 169 (1):91 - 124.
Christian Wüthrich (2009). Do the Laws of Physics Forbid the Operation of Time Machines? Synthese 169 (1):91 - 124.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #71,063 of 549,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,252 of 549,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?