Paediatric MRI research ethics: The priority issues [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (2):85-91 (2007)
In this paper, we first briefly describe neuroimaging technology, our reasons for studying magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology, and then provide a discussion of what we have identified as priority issues for paediatric MRI research. We examine the issues of respectful involvement of children in the consent process as well as privacy and confidentiality for this group of MRI research participants. In addition, we explore the implications of unexpected findings for paediatric MRI research participants. Finally, we explore the ethical issues concerning advances in functional MRI. This paper aims to provide a clear description of priority paediatric MRI research ethics issues to make some preliminary recommendations regarding next steps.
|Keywords||Magnetic resonance imaging Paediatrics Informed consent Privacy Confidentiality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Harris & Søren Holm (2003). Should We Presume Moral Turpitude in Our Children? – Small Children and Consent to Medical Research. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (2):121-129.
Paul B. Miller & Nuala P. Kenny (2002). Walking the Moral Tightrope: Respecting and Protecting Children in Health-Related Research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (3):217-229.
Citations of this work BETA
Paul Howard-Jones & Kate Fenton (2012). The Need for Interdisciplinary Dialogue in Developing Ethical Approaches to Neuroeducational Research. Neuroethics 5 (2):119-134.
Similar books and articles
Elyn R. Saks, Dilip V. Jeste, Eric Granholm, Barton W. Palmer & Lawrence Schneiderman (2002). Ethical Issues in Psychosocial Interventions Research Involving Controls. Ethics and Behavior 12 (1):87 – 101.
Nikos Logothetis, In Vivo Brain Connectivity: Optimization of Manganese Enhanced MRI for Neuronal Tract Tracing.
Conrad Vincent Fernandez, Shaureen Taweel, Eric D. Kodish & Charles Weijer, Disclosure of Research Result to Research Participants: Needs and Attitudes of Adolescents and Parents.
Mark S. Cohen & Davis Baird (1999). Why Trade? Perspectives on Science 7 (2):231-254.
R. W. Thatcher, J. F. Gomez-Molina, C. Biver, D. North, R. Curtin & R. W. Walker (2000). Two Compartmental Models of EEG Coherence and MRI Biophysics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):412-412.
Adam Lindgreen, Michael Antioco, David Harness & Remi van der Sloot (2009). Purchasing and Marketing of Social and Environmental Sustainability for High-Tech Medical Equipment. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2):445 - 462.
Rob Reuzel (2004). Interactive Technology Assessment of Paediatric Cochlear Implantation. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):119-137.
Jason M. Royal & Bradley S. Peterson (2008). The Risks and Benefits of Searching for Incidental Findings in MRI Research Scans. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36 (2):305-314.
Charles A. Nelson (2008). Incidental Findings in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Brain Research. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36 (2):315-319.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #158,699 of 1,941,073 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #225,913 of 1,941,073 )
How can I increase my downloads?