Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 76 (5):701-711 (2009)
|Abstract||This article raises two difficulties that certain approaches to causation have with would‐cause counterfactuals. First, there is a problem with David Lewis’s semantics of counterfactuals when we ‘suppose in’ some positive event of a certain kind. And, second, there is a problem with embedded counterfactuals. I show that causal‐modeling approaches do not have these problems. †To contact the author, please write to: Philosophy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia; e‐mail: email@example.com.|
|Keywords||Causation Nonlocality Preemption 2203 Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jochen Kluve (2004). On the Role of Counterfactuals in Inferring Causal Effects. Foundations of Science 9 (1):65-101.
Robert Northcott (2009). On Lewis, Schaffer and the Non-Reductive Evaluation of Counterfactuals. Theoria 75 (4):336-343.
Charles B. Cross (2006). Conditional Logic and the Significance of Tooley's Example. Analysis 66 (292):325–335.
Eric Swanson (2011). On the Treatment of Incomparability in Ordering Semantics and Premise Semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (6):693-713.
Agustín Vicente (2002). The Localism of the Conserved Quantity Theory. Theoria 45 (563):571.
David Lewis (1981). Ordering Semantics and Premise Semantics for Counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10 (2):217-234.
Charles B. Cross (2008). Antecedent-Relative Comparative World Similarity. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (2):101-120.
Phil Dowe (2007). Constraints on Data in Worlds with Closed Timelike Curves. Philosophy of Science 74 (5):724–735.
Added to index2010-02-17
Total downloads17 ( #78,069 of 723,483 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 723,483 )
How can I increase my downloads?