Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 59 (2):195-216 (1992)
|Abstract||This paper examines Wesley Salmon's "process" theory of causality, arguing in particular that there are four areas of inadequacy. These are that the theory is circular, that it is too vague at a crucial point, that statistical forks do not serve their intended purpose, and that Salmon has not adequately demonstrated that the theory avoids Hume's strictures about "hidden powers". A new theory is suggested, based on "conserved quantities", which fulfills Salmon's broad objectives, and which avoids the problems discussed|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Phil Dowe (1995). Causality and Conserved Quantities: A Reply to Salmon. Philosophy of Science 62 (2):321-333.
Wesley C. Salmon (1997). Causality and Explanation: A Reply to Two Critiques. Philosophy of Science 64 (3):461-477.
Agustín Vicente (2002). The Localism of the Conserved Quantity Theory. Theoria 45 (563):571.
Phil Dowe (2004). Causation and Misconnections. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):926-931.
Phil Dowe (1992). An Empiricist Defence of the Causal Account of Explanation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (2):123 – 128.
Anton Froeyman (2012). The Ontology of Causal Process Theories. Philosophia 40 (3):523-538.
Wesley C. Salmon (1994). Causality Without Counterfactuals. Philosophy of Science 61 (2):297-312.
Max Kistler (1998). Reducing Causality to Transmission. Erkenntnis 48 (1):1-25.
Phil Dowe (2000). The Conserved Quantity Theory Defended. Theoria 15 (1):11-31.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads68 ( #15,863 of 740,453 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,533 of 740,453 )
How can I increase my downloads?