David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kantian Review 15 (2):90-117 (2011)
In recent years Nick Zangwill has gone a long way in championing a moderate aesthetic formalism in an attempt to accommodate those objects that many of us call beautiful despite their lack of any formal beauty. While there is some dispute in the literature about the extent to which Kant can be interpreted as an aesthetic formalist, the appeal of his famous distinction between free and dependent beauty should present a fairly natural ally for Zangwill's project. Indeed, such an alliance has been expressed by Zangwill, who first reaches for this ‘invaluable but misunderstood and underappreciated distinction’ in his ‘Feasible aesthetic formalism’ . Here, Zangwill claims that this essential distinction can be cut loose from Kant's terminology and views about aesthetic judgement. More recently he expresses more strongly that ‘Kant was also a moderate formalist, who opposes extreme formalism when he distinguished free and dependent beauty in §16 of the Critique of Judgement’ . Yet, a decade on from the initial suggestion, there has been little further exploration or elucidation of this move, or indeed this potential characterization of Kant's aesthetics. It is the aim of this paper to begin to address that deficiency by identifying the extent to which a moderate formalist position is available in Kant's aesthetic. I will suggest that Kant's account does not require substantial modification in order to cast him as a moderate formalist. Taking the time to isolate the plausible grounds for characterizing Kant's aesthetic in this way, this discussion will enable us to explore some of the rival interpretations of his work such that we may also identify the kind of Kantian the moderate formalist is likely to be
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
M. Budd (1998). Delight in the Natural World: Kant on the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. Part 1: Natural Beauty. British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (1):1-18.
Andrew Chignell (2006). Beauty as a Symbol of Natural Systematicity. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (4):406-415.
Donald W. Crawford (1974). Kant's Aesthetic Theory. [Madison]University of Wisconsin Press.
Gregory Currie (1989). An Ontology of Art. St. Martin's Press.
Gregory Currie (1990). Supervenience, Essentialism and Aesthetic Properties. Philosophical Studies 58 (3):243 - 257.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nick Zangwill (1999). Feasible Aesthetic Formalism. Noûs 33 (4):610-629.
Nick Zangwill (2000). In Defence of Moderate Aesthetic Formalism. Philosophical Quarterly 50 (201):476-493.
Nick Zangwill (2000). Defusing Anti-Formalist Arguments. British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (3):376-383.
Jennifer A. McMahon (2010). The Classical Trinity and Kant's Aesthetic Formalism. Critical Horizons 11 (3):419-441.
Khosrow Bagheri Noaparast & Mohammad Zoheir Bagheri Noaparast (2011). Aesthetic Formalism, Reactions and Solutions. Wisdom and Philosophy 6 (4):101-112.
Glenn Parsons (2004). Moderate Formalism as a Theory of the Aesthetic. Journal of Aesthetic Education 38 (3):19-35.
Nick Zangwill (2005). In Defence of Extreme Formalism About Inorganic Nature: Reply to Parsons. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (2):185-191.
David E. W. Fenner (2008). Formalism and the Consumable Arts. Journal of Philosophical Research 33:127-141.
Nick Zangwill (2001). Formal Natural Beauty. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (2):209–224.
Albert Hofstadter (1975). Kant's Aesthetic Revolution. Journal of Religious Ethics 3 (2):171 - 191.
Rachel Zuckert (2006). The Purposiveness of Form: A Reading of Kant's Aesthetic Formalism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (4):599-622.
Paul Crowther (1984). Kant and Greenberg's Varieties of Aesthetic Formalism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 42 (4):442-445.
Nick Zangwill (1998). The Concept of the Aesthetic. European Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):78–93.
Daniel A. Siedell (2011). Art in and Out of Context. Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (1):118-122.
Wayne A. Mastin (1991). A Purely Formal Ethical Theory in Kant's Groundwork? Philosophy and Theology 6 (1):3-20.
Added to index2011-02-02
Total downloads38 ( #64,240 of 1,696,615 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,146 of 1,696,615 )
How can I increase my downloads?