Austin Dacey, the secular conscience: Why belief belongs in public life
Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (1) (2010)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJeffrey Hershfield (2010). What Can Austin Tell Us About Truth? Philosophical Investigations 33 (3):220-228.
Paul James Crittenden (2009). A Secular Age: Reflections on Charles Taylor′s Recent Book. Sophia 48 (4).
Patrick D. Hopkins & Austin Dacey (2008). Vegetarian Meat: Could Technology Save Animals and Satisfy Meat Eaters? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (6).
Ryan E. Lawrence & Farr A. Curlin (2007). Clash of Definitions: Controversies About Conscience in Medicine. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (12):10 – 14.
Edward Andrew & Peter Lindsay (2008). Are the Judgments of Conscience Unreasonable? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (2):235-254.
Austin Dacey (2001). Elliott Sober and David Sloan Wilson: Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (2):279-283.
Basil Mitchell (1980/2000). Morality, Religious and Secular: The Dilemma of the Traditional Conscience. Oxford University Press.
Austin Dacey (1999). Swinburne's Ultimate Explanation. Philo 2 (2):71-74.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-02-01Total downloads2 ( #232,575 of 549,113 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
