Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 114 (2):325-339 (2013)
|Abstract||How tax practitioners approach ethical dilemmas remains generally unexplored in academic literature. We use here Rest’s original Defining Issues Test (Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1979; Moral development. Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1986), combined with a tax context-specific test and in conjunction with a control group of non-tax specialists, to examine tax practitioners’ moral reasoning in a social and tax context. We investigate: (i) the effect of a tax context on issues raised (finding that practitioners generally reason at lower levels than in social scenarios); (ii) whether the profession attracts people who reason at certain levels (finding that it does not); and (iii) whether practitioners are affected by training/socialization in their professional context (finding that that they are)|
|Keywords||DIT Moral reasoning Revenue practitioner Tax practice Tax practitioner|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Elaine Doyle, Jane Frecknall-Hughes & Barbara Summers (2009). Research Methods in Taxation Ethics: Developing the Defining Issues Test (Dit) for a Tax-Specific Scenario. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1):35 - 52.
Elaine M. Doyle, Jane Frecknall Hughes & Keith W. Glaister (2009). Linking Ethics and Risk Management in Taxation: Evidence From an Exploratory Study in Ireland and the Uk. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 86 (2):177 - 198.
D. Bobek Donna, M. Hageman Amy & R. Radtke Robin (2010). The Ethical Environment of Tax Professionals: Partner and Non-Partner Perceptions and Experiences. Journal of Business Ethics 92 (4).
Scott A. Yetmar & Kenneth K. Eastman (2000). Tax Practitioners' Ethical Sensitivity: A Model and Empirical Examination. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 26 (4):271 - 288.
Cheryl A. Cruz, William E. Shafer & Jerry R. Strawser (2000). A Multidimensional Analysis of Tax Practitioners' Ethical Judgments. Journal of Business Ethics 24 (3):223 - 244.
Juan Carlos Molero & Francesc Pujol (2012). Walking Inside the Potential Tax Evader's Mind: Tax Morale Does Matter. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):151-162.
Yuka Sakurai & Valerie Braithwaite (2003). Taxpayers' Perceptions of Practitioners: Finding One Who Is Effective and Does the Right Thing? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 46 (4):375 - 387.
Rex L. Marshall, Robert W. Armstrong & Malcolm Smith (1998). The Ethical Environment of Tax Practitioners: Western Australian Evidence. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (12):1265-1279.
Colin Higgins, Paul Lieber & Patti Poole (2006). Passing the Ethical Litmus Test. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:15-17.
Robert W. McGee, Simon S. M. Ho & Annie Y. S. Li (2008). A Comparative Study on Perceived Ethics of Tax Evasion: Hong Kong Vs the United States. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 77 (2):147 - 158.
W. McGee Robert, S. M. Ho Simon & Y. S. Li Annie (2008). A Comparative Study on Perceived Ethics of Tax Evasion: Hong Kong Vs the United States. Journal of Business Ethics 77 (2).
V. Umashanker Trivedi, Mohamed Shehata & Bernadette Lynn (2003). Impact of Personal and Situational Factors on Taxpayer Compliance: An Experimental Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 47 (3):175 - 197.
David A. Latif (2000). Ethical Cognition and Selection-Socialization in Retail Pharmacy. Journal of Business Ethics 25 (4):343 - 357.
Paul S. Lieber (2005). Ethical Considerations of Public Relations Practitioners: An Empirical Analysis of the Tares Test. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 20 (4):288 – 304.
Lars Fallan (1999). Gender, Exposure to Tax Knowledge, and Attitudes Towards Taxation; an Experimental Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 18 (2):173 - 184.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-05-21
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?