Ethics, nuclear terrorism, and counter-terrorist nuclear reprisals – a response to John mark mattox's 'nuclear terrorism: The other extreme of irregular warfare'
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Military Ethics 10 (4):296-308 (2011)
This paper critically examines John Mark Mattox's view of the nature of the moral appropriateness of particular response options. By so doing, I aim to engage the wider readership in a debate, which I hope leads to greater clarity and precision of thinking on these topics. After summarizing Mattox's view, I argue first that in order for Mattox's ultimate conclusion to hold in moral terms, he must abandon the argument on the permissibility of nuclear reprisal to re-establish nuclear deterrence and instead anchor this response solely on the moral grounds of retributive justice. Secondly, I argue that the morally superior and politically efficacious counter-nuclear terrorist response is to hunt down the nuclear terrorists and hold them accountable for war crimes in the International Criminal Court. This response is consistent with just war theoretic principles, and it also affirms the moral virtues of honor, dignity, and humane treatment in contexts where they are needed the most? the holocausts of nuclear terrorist attacks
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Stephen Toulmin (2003). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.
Brian Orend (2006). The Morality of War. Broadview Press.
Steven Lee (1985). The Morality of Nuclear Deterrence: Hostage Holding and Consequences. Ethics 95 (3):549-566.
Gregory S. Kavka (1978). Some Paradoxes of Deterrence. Journal of Philosophy 75 (6):285-302.
Jeffrey Reiman & Louis P. Pojman (1997). The Death Penalty: For and Against. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Mark Mattox (2011). The Moral Limits of a Nuclear Response to Nuclear Terrorism: A Response to Thomas E. Doyle II. Journal of Military Ethics 10 (4):309-315.
John Mark Mattox (2010). Nuclear Terrorism: The 'Other' Extreme of Irregular Warfare. Journal of Military Ethics 9 (2):160-176.
Francis Bridger (ed.) (1983). The Cross and the Bomb: Christian Ethics and the Nuclear Debate. Mowbray.
Geoffrey L. Goodwin (ed.) (1982). Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence. St. Martin's Press.
Jeff McMahan (1989). Is Nuclear Deterrence Paradoxical?:Nuclear Deterrence, Morality, and Realism. John Finnis, Joseph M. Boyle, Jr., Germain Grisez; Moral Paradoxes of Nuclear Deterrence. Gregory Kavka. [REVIEW] Ethics 99 (2):407-.
Michael Allen Fox (1987). Nuclear Weapons and the Ultimate Environmental Crisis. Environmental Ethics 9 (2):159-179.
Robert McKim (1985). An Examination of a Moral Argument Against Nuclear Deterrence. Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):279 - 297.
Robert E. Goodin (1985). Disarming Nuclear Apologists. Inquiry 28 (1-4):153 – 176.
Henry Shue (ed.) (1989). Nuclear Deterrence and Moral Restraint. Cambridge University Press.
David J. Lonsdale (2012). Nuclear Strategy and Catholicism: A Reappraisal. Journal of Military Ethics 11 (3):186-207.
Olaf L. Müller (2005). Benign Blackmail. Cassandra's Plan or What Is Terrorism? In Georg Meggle (ed.), Ethics of Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism. Ontos 39-50.
Gilles D. Hurteau (1989). Global Peace as a Professional Concern, II. Journal of Business Ethics 8 (2-3):173 - 175.
Added to index2012-01-04
Total downloads9 ( #363,763 of 1,907,063 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,221 of 1,907,063 )
How can I increase my downloads?