Research methods in taxation ethics: Developing the defining issues test (dit) for a tax-specific scenario [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1):35 - 52 (2009)
|Abstract||This paper reports on the development of a research instrument designed to explore ethical reasoning in a tax context. This research instrument is a version of the Defining Issues Test (DIT) originally developed by Rest [1979a, Development in Judging Moral Issues (Univer sity of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN); 1979b, Defining Issues Test (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)], but adapted to focus specifically on the environment encountered by tax practitioners. The paper explores reasons for developing a context-(and profession-) specific test, and details the manner in which this was undertaken. The study on which it is based aims to compare the reasoning of tax practitioners in the taxspecific context and in the general social context covered by the original DIT, and to compare this with the reasoning of non-specialists in these two contexts. The paper therefore also considers the issues that arise when using such tests to compare reasoning in different domains or to compare groups. The focus on instrument development to measure ethical reasoning in a specific domain will contribute to the literature on research methods in the area of the DIT and will facilitate cross-study comparisons|
|Keywords||Defining Issues Test context-specific scenario ethical reasoning research methods tax practitioners|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Terri Lee Robinett (2008). A Comparison of Moral Reasoning Stages Using a Model of Hierarchical Complexity. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):468 – 479.
William Y. Penn (1990). Teaching Ethics ‐A Direct Approach. Journal of Moral Education 19 (2):124-138.
Mohammad J. Abdolmohammadi & C. Richard Baker (2006). Accountants' Value Preferences and Moral Reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics 69 (1):11 - 25.
Renita Coleman & Lee Wilkins (2002). Searching for the Ethical Journalist: An Exploratory Study of the Moral Development of News Workers. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 17 (3):209 – 225.
Elaine M. Doyle, Jane Frecknall Hughes & Keith W. Glaister (2009). Linking Ethics and Risk Management in Taxation: Evidence From an Exploratory Study in Ireland and the Uk. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 86 (2):177 - 198.
Dann G. Fisher & John T. Sweeney (1998). The Relationship Between Political Attitudes and Moral Judgment: Examining the Validity of the Defining Issues Test. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (8):905-916.
Judith A. Maccallum (1993). Teacher Reasoning and Moral Judgement in the Context of Student Discipline Situations. Journal of Moral Education 22 (1):3-17.
Peter E. Mudrack (2003). The Untapped Relevance of Moral Development Theory in the Study of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 42 (3):225 - 236.
Kelly Richmond Pope (2005). Measuring the Ethical Propensities of Accounting Students: Mach IV Versus DIT. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 3 (2-4):89-111.
Chiharu Ishida (2006). How Do Scores of DIT and MJT Differ? A Critical Assessment of the Use of Alternative Moral Development Scales in Studies of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (1):63 - 74.
Added to index2009-08-08
Total downloads10 ( #114,557 of 740,548 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,548 )
How can I increase my downloads?