Theoria 53 (109):28-48 (2006)
|Abstract||In a widely cited and controversial speech, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan highlighted the moral character of the boundaries of political sovereignty when he questioned whether respecting national sovereignty everywhere and always precluded the international protection of human rights. He argued that it did not and highlighted the importance of multilateral authorization. In this article, I explore the difference that multilateral authority, as opposed to unilateral national decision, should make in justifying armed intervention. Should the more salient role of the United Nations lead us to a more expansive tolerance of international intervention? And, if multilateralism does make a difference—and many think its impartiality is key—are good intentions enough? Had the international community also discovered how to intervene more effectively, with a better prospect of self-sustaining self-determination, at an acceptable humanitarian cost? I will conclude that multilateralism should widen our acceptance of intervention, even though the intentions at play are not reliably superior to unilateral intentions.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
F. Cheneval, Toward a Normative Theory of Multilateral Democracy: The Original Position and the Principles.
Richard B. Miller (2000). Humanitarian Intervention, Altruism, and the Limits of Casuistry. Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (1):3 - 35.
Ned Dobos (2010). On Altruistic War and National Responsibility: Justifying Humanitarian Intervention to Soldiers and Taxpayers. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (1).
Ned Dobos (2011). Insurrection and Intervention: The Two Faces of Sovereignty. Cambridge University Press.
Ned Dobos (forthcoming). Is U.N. Security Council Authorisation for Armed Humanitarian Intervention Morally Necessary? Philosophia.
Jennifer Szende (2012). Selective Humanitarian Intervention: Moral Reason and Collective Agents. Journal of Global Ethics 8 (1):63-76.
Rory J. Conces (2001). Justifying Coercive and Non-Coercive Intervention: Strategic and Humanitarian Arguments. Acta Analytica 16 (27):133-52.
M. Kahler (2011). Legitimacy, Humanitarian Intervention, and International Institutions. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):20-45.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #28,897 of 549,113 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,113 )
How can I increase my downloads?