A further reappraisal of impetus theory: Buridan, Benedetti, and Galileo

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/0039-3681(76)90010-8
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,879
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A. G. Molland (1982). The Atomisation of Motion: A Facet of the Scientific Revolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (1):31-54.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Gunnar Andersson (1991). The Tower Experiment and the Copernican Revolution. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (2):143 – 152.
Gyula Klima (2009). John Buridan. Oxford University Press.
Paloma Pérez-Ilzarbe (2003). John Buridan and Jerónimo Pardo on the Notion of Propositio. In R. L. Friedman & S. Ebbesen (eds.), John Buridan and Beyond. Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters 89--153.
Stillman Drake (1978). Galileo's Early Notebooks. New Scholasticism 52 (4):586-587.
Stillman Drake (1989). Hipparchus-Geminus-Galileo. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 20 (1):47-56.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

23 ( #126,376 of 1,725,189 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #167,147 of 1,725,189 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.