|Abstract||My answer to the title question is a qualified "Yes." A certain rare form of creationism is in principle testable and compatible with natural law, and therefore scientific, however, this is a moot point. I arrive at my conclusions purely through thought experiments. But before getting to that, let us first consider the issues of what creationism is and what it means for a theory to be scientific.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Andrew Gregory (2010). Creationism (D.) Sedley Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. (Sather Classical Lectures 66.) Pp. Xviii + 269. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 2007. Cased, £17.95, US$29.95. ISBN: 978-0-520-25364-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 60 (02):364-366.
William Hasker (2009). Intelligent Design. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):586-597.
Doren Recker (2007). Scientific Creationism, Intelligent Design, and the Demarcation Problem. Southwest Philosophy Review 23 (1):27-38.
John Robert Baker (1992). The Epistemological Veil of Scientific Creationism. Southwest Philosophy Review 8 (1):173-181.
Alberto Voltolini (2008). The Seven Consequences of Creationism. Metaphysica 10 (1):27-48.
Michael J. Reiss (2011). How Should Creationism and Intelligent Design Be Dealt with in the Classroom? Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):399-415.
Stuart Brock (2010). The Creationist Fiction: The Case Against Creationism About Fictional Characters. Philosophical Review 119 (3):337-364.
Hee-Joo Park (2000). The Politics of Anti-Creationism: The Committees of Correspondence. Journal of the History of Biology 33 (2):349 - 370.
Jeffrey Goodman (2004). A Defense of Creationism in Fiction. Grazer Philosophische Studien 67 (1):131-155.
Added to index2009-12-27
Total downloads14 ( #83,077 of 549,070 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,070 )
How can I increase my downloads?