God or Blind Nature? Philosophers Debate the Evidence
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Internet Infidels (Online Publisher) (2008)
This book consists of four nonpartisan debates about the existence of God. Each debate examines distinct related areas of evidence for and against naturalism and theism. The topics of the first debate are the mind and the will, and the debaters are a naturalist, Andrew Melnyk, and two theists, Steward Goetz and Charles Taliaferro. Next, Paul Draper defends an evolutionary argument from evil against theism, while Alvin Plantinga argues that evolutionary naturalism is self-defeating. In the final two debates, Quentin Smith and Robin Collins examine evidence from the physical sciences, while John Schellenberg and Jeffrey Jordan debate divine hiddenness and pragmatic justifications of theistic belief
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert K. Fleck (2011). Natural Selection and the Problem of Evil: An Evolutionary Model with Application to an Ancient Debate. Zygon 46 (3):561-587.
Similar books and articles
Robin Collins (2008). The Case for Cosmic Design. In God or Blind Nature?: Philosopher’s Debate the Evidence (2007-2008). Internet Infidels (Online Publisher).
J. L. Schellenberg, What Divine Hiddenness Reveals. God or Blind Nature? Philosophers Debate the Evidence.
Andrew Melnyk, Physicalism and the First-Person Point of View: A Reply To Taliaferro and Goetz. God or Blind Nature? Philosophers Debate the Evidence.
J. L. Schellenberg, Jordan's Jamesian Wager. God or Blind Nature? Philosophers Debate the Evidence.
Andrew Melnyk, Naturalism, Free Choices, And Conscious Experiences. God or Blind Nature? Philosophers Debate the Evidence.
J. L. Schellenberg, The Sounds of Silence Stilled: A Reply to Jordan. God or Blind Nature? Philosophers Debate the Evidence.
Andrew Melnyk, A Case For Physicalism About The Human Mind. God or Blind Nature? Philosophers Debate the Evidence.
Robin Collins (2008). God or Blind Nature?: Philosopher’s Debate the Evidence (2007-2008). Internet Infidels (Online Publisher).
Paul K. Moser (2010). The Evidence for God: Religious Knowledge Reexamined. Cambridge University Press.
Christine Overall (2006). Miracles, Evidence, Evil, and God: A Twenty-Year Debate. Dialogue 45 (2):355-366.
David Silver (2002). Religious Experience and the Evidential Argument From Evil. Religious Studies 38 (3):339-353.
Richard Otte (2000). Evidential Arguments From Evil. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 48 (1):1-10.
Daniel Howard-Snyder (1996). The Argument From Divine Hiddenness. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):433-453.
Daniel Howard-Snyder (ed.) (1996). The Evidential Argument From Evil. Indiana University Press.
Hunter Brown (2013). Incarnation and the Divine Hiddenness Debate. Heythrop Journal 54 (2):252-260.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-06-17
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?