David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Logica Universalis 2 (1):127-141 (2008)
. Each predicate of the Aristotelian square of opposition includes the word “is”. Through a twofold interpretation of this word the square includes both classical logic and non-classical logic. All theses embodied by the square of opposition are preserved by the new interpretation, except for contradictories, which are substituted by incommensurabilities. Indeed, the new interpretation of the square of opposition concerns the relationships among entire theories, each represented by means of a characteristic predicate. A generalization of the square of opposition is achieved by not adjoining, according to two Leibniz’ suggestions about human mind, one more choice about the kind of infinity; i.e., a choice which was unknown by Greek’s culture, but which played a decisive role for the birth and then the development of modern science. This essential innovation of modern scientific culture explains why in modern times the Aristotelian square of opposition was disregarded.
|Keywords||Square of opposition non-classical logic incommensurabilities Leibniz infinity fundamental choices|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Chris Johns (2015). Leibniz and the Square: A Deontic Logic for the Vir Bonus. History and Philosophy of Logic 35 (4):369-376.
Similar books and articles
Everett J. Nelson (1932). The Square of Opposition. The Monist 42 (2):269-278.
George Englebretsen (1976). The Square of Opposition. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 17 (4):531-541.
Larry Horn, Lexical Pragmatics and the Geometry of Opposition: The Mystery of *Nall and *Nand Revisited.
Luis Estrada-González (2008). Weakened Semantics and the Traditional Square of Opposition. Logica Universalis 2 (1):155-165.
Mary Tiles & Yuan Jinmei (2004). Could the Aristotelian Square of Opposition Be Translated Into Chinese? Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 4 (1):137-149.
Wolfgang Lenzen (2008). Ploucquet's “Refutation” of the Traditional Square of Opposition. Logica Universalis 2 (1):43-58.
Terence Parsons, The Traditional Square of Opposition. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Terence Parsons (2008). Things That Are Right with the Traditional Square of Opposition. Logica Universalis 2 (1):3-11.
Valentin A. Bazhanov (2008). Non-Classical Stems From Classical: N. A. Vasiliev's Approach to Logic and His Reassessment of the Square of Opposition. [REVIEW] Logica Universalis 2 (1):71-76.
Author unknown, Square of Opposition. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads48 ( #83,862 of 1,789,998 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #424,764 of 1,789,998 )
How can I increase my downloads?