|Abstract||The title question "Why be moral?" has been around a long time. One use that is sometimes made of it is to argue that the only possible basis that morality can have is one that connects it with God. Thus, it is said, theists have an answer for the question whereas nontheists have none. Part of my goal in the present paper is to refute that claim. But before addressing the title question, let us first inquire: what does it mean to be moral ? There are at least six definitions that might be considered, as follows.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Uriah Kriegel (2008). Moral Phenomenology: Foundational Issues. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (1):1-19.
Yong Huang (2008). "WHY BE MORAL?" The Cheng Brothers' Neo-Confucian Answer. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (2):321-353.
Susan Mendus (2003). The Magic in the Pronoun My. In Matt Matravers (ed.), Scanlon and Contractualism. Frank Cass.
Caj Strandberg (2007). Externalism and the Content of Moral Motivation. Philosophia 35 (2):249-260.
John Corvino (2006). Reframing “Morality Pays”: Toward a Better Answer to “Why Be Moral?” In Business. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 67 (1):1 - 14.
Richard Joyce (2008). Morality, Schmorality. In Paul Bloomfield (ed.), Morality and Self-Interest. Oxford University Press.
Bernward Gesang (2010). Are Moral Philosophers Moral Experts? Bioethics 24 (4):153-159.
Brian K. Powell (2006). Kant and Kantians on “the Normative Question”. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (5):535 - 544.
Added to index2009-12-27
Total downloads26 ( #53,605 of 722,933 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,933 )
How can I increase my downloads?