David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Minds and Machines 22 (2):87-99 (2012)
In the 1960s, without realizing it, AI researchers were hard at work finding the features, rules, and representations needed for turning rationalist philosophy into a research program, and by so doing AI researchers condemned their enterprise to failure. About the same time, a logician, Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, pointed out that AI optimism was based on what he called the “first step fallacy”. First step thinking has the idea of a successful last step built in. Limited early success, however, is not a valid basis for predicting the ultimate success of one’s project. Climbing a hill should not give one any assurance that if he keeps going he will reach the sky. Perhaps one may have overlooked some serious problem lying ahead. There is, in fact, no reason to think that we are making progress towards AI or, indeed, that AI is even possible, in which case claiming incremental progress towards it would make no sense. In current excited waiting for the singularity, religion and technology converge. Hard headed materialists desperately yearn for a world where our bodies no longer have to grow old and die. They will be transformed into information, like Google digitizes old books, and we will achieve the promise of eternal life. As an existential philosopher, however, I suggest that we may have to overcome the desperate desire to digitalize our bodies so as to achieve immortality, and, instead, face up to and maybe even enjoy our embodied finitude.
|Keywords||AI Singularity First-Step-Fallacy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Martin Heidegger (1962). Being and Time. London, Scm Press.
Rodney Brooks (1991). Intelligence Without Representation. Artificial Intelligence 47:139-159.
David J. Chalmers (2010). The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis. Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (9-10):9 - 10.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (2007). Why Heideggerian Ai Failed and How Fixing It Would Require Making It More Heideggerian. Philosophical Psychology 20 (2):247 – 268.
Allen Newell & Herbert A. Simon (1981). Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and Search. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 19:113-26.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christopher W. Tindale (2007). Fallacies and Argument Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.
Jonathan E. Adler (2000). Three Fallacies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):665-666.
Bradley Dowden, Fallacies. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Herman E. Stark (2000). Fallacies and Logical Errors. Inquiry 20 (1):23-32.
Douglas N. Walton (1992). Which of the Fallacies Are Fallacies of Relevance? Argumentation 6 (2):237-250.
Krzysztof A. Wieczorek (2011). Mechanizmy „staczania się” po równi pochyłej. Filozofia Nauki 2.
Laurence B. McCullough & Carol M. Ashton (1994). A Methodology for Teaching Ethics in the Clinical Setting: A Clinical Handbook for Medical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (1).
C. L. Hamblin (1970/1993). Fallacies. Vale Press.
Pieter Sjoerd Hasper (2013). The Ingredients of Aristotle's Theory of Fallacy. Argumentation 27 (1):31-47.
Douglas N. Walton (1987). Informal Fallacies: Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms. J. Benjamins Pub. Co..
Luciano Floridi (2009). Logical Fallacies as Informational Shortcuts. Synthese 167 (2):317 - 325.
Bert Gordijn Rob de Vries (2009). Empirical Ethics and its Alleged Meta-Ethical Fallacies. Bioethics 23 (4):193-201.
Added to index2012-06-23
Total downloads77 ( #51,809 of 1,790,148 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #140,520 of 1,790,148 )
How can I increase my downloads?