Fatal Attraction. Wildnes in Contemporary Film
Environmental Ethics 31 (3):297-315 (2009)
| Abstract | The concept of wildness not only plays a role in philosophical debates, but also in popular culture. Wild nature is often seen as a place outside the cultural sphere where one can still encounter instances of transcendence. Some writers and moviemakers contest the dominant romanticized view of wild nature by telling stories that somehow show a different harsher face of nature. In encounters with the wild and unruly, humans can sometimes experience the misfit between their well-ordered, human-centered, self-created world view and the otherness of nature, and in doing so face, what Plumwood calls, “the view from the outside.” Three films—Gerry, Into the Wild, and Grizzly Man—deal with contemporary encounters with wildness. What these works have in common is the central theme of modern humans who are fascinated by wild nature and seek experiences unknown to those limited to the overly cultivated life (psyche) of modern society. Another connecting theme, however, is that any idealization of wildness is in itself deeply problematic. All three films have fatal endings, which in turn fascinates the contemporary viewers. These films show, first, that wildness is conceived as a moral counterforce against the overly civilized world; and, second, that fascination with this wildness has itself become thoroughly reflexive, and | |||||||||
| Keywords | Wilderness Wildness Environmental hermeneutics | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesThomas H. Birch (1990). The Incarceration of Wildness: Wilderness Areas as Prisons. Environmental Ethics 12 (1):3-26.
Robert Chapman (2004). Crowded Solitude. Environmental Philosophy 1 (1):58-72.
Sean Williams (2006). Chiasmic Wildness. Environmental Philosophy 3 (1):6-12.
Isis Brook (2008). Wildness in the English Garden Tradition: A Reassessment of the Picturesque From Environmental Philosophy. Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 105-119.
Eric Katz (1992). The Call of the Wild: The Struggle Against Domination and the Technological Fix of Nature. Environmental Ethics 14 (3):265-273.
R. Edward Grumbine (1994). Wildness, Wise Use, and Sustainable Development. Environmental Ethics 16 (3):227-249.
I. I. I. Rolston (1983). Values Gone Wild. Inquiry 26 (2):181 – 207.
Jim Cheney (1996). The Dusty World: Wildness and Higher Laws in Thoreau's Walden. Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):75 - 90.
Kenneth H. Simonsen (1981). The Value of Wildness. Environmental Ethics 3 (3):259-263.
Kate Booth (2011). In Wilderness and Wildness. Environmental Ethics 33 (3):283-293.
Eileen O'Rourke (2000). The Reintroduction and Reinterpretation of the Wild. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (1):144-165.
Mark A. Michael (2002). Why Not Interfere with Nature? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (1):89-112.
Wayne Ouderkirk (2003). On Wilderness and People: A View From Mount Marcy. Philosophy and Geography 6 (1):15 – 32.
John Dilworth (2003). Ariadne at the Movies. Contemporary Aesthetics 1 (1):Online.
Michael P. Nelson (1996). Rethinking Wilderness. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 3 (2):6-9.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-01-09Total downloads3 ( #201,781 of 549,011 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,011 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
