Hastings Center Report 41 (3):11-12 (2011)
|Abstract||Law enforcement officials often turn to DNA identification methods to detect—and rule out—possible offenders. Every state operates its own database of convicted offenders' DNA profiles; some states store profiles of arrested people, too. The Federal Bureau of Investigation maintains a national database of profiles submitted by laboratories across the country.A few years ago, officials came up with a new way to use DNA profiles in forensic identification. Ordinary searches require an exact match between DNA found at a crime scene and a forensic DNA profile. A partial match means that the profiled individual should not be considered a suspect. But partial matches create another possibility: the crime scene DNA may ..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
J. J. Gamero, J. -L. Romero, J. -L. Peralta, M. Carvalho & F. Corte-Real (2007). Spanish Public Awareness Regarding DNA Profile Databases in Forensic Genetics: What Type of DNA Profiles Should Be Included? Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (10):598-604.
M. Levitt & F. Tomasini, Bar-Coded Children: An Exploration of Issues Around the Inclusion of Children on the England and Wales National DNA Database.
M. Dawn Herkenham (2006). Retention of Offender DNA Samples Necessary to Ensure and Monitor Quality of Forensic DNA Efforts: Appropriate Safeguards Exist to Protect the DNA Samples From Misuse. Journal of Law, Medicine
Ethics 34 (2):380-384.
Jasper A. Bovenberg (2006). Property Rights in Blood, Genes and Data: Naturally Yours? Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Osagie K. Obasogie & Troy Duster (2011). All That Glitters Isn't Gold. Hastings Center Report 41 (5):15-18.
Amade M'charek (2008). Silent Witness, Articulate Collective: Dna Evidence and the Inference of Visible Traits. Bioethics 22 (9):519-528.
M. Richards (2001). How Distinctive is Genetic Information? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (4):663-687.
Holly K. Fernandez (2005). Genetic Privacy, Abandonment, and DNA Dragnets: Is Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence Adequate? Hastings Center Report 35 (1):21-23.
Marcia J. Weiss (2004). Beware! Uncle Sam has Your DNA: Legal Fallout From its Use and Misuse in the U.S. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):55-63.
Matthew Gabriel, Cherisse Boland & Cydne Holt (2010). Beyond the Cold Hit: Measuring the Impact of the National DNA Data Bank on Public Safety at the City and County Level. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):396-411.
William J. Morgan Jr, Justice in Hindsight: The Problem with Eyewitness Identification and Exoneration by DNA Technology.
Michael Lynch & Ruth McNally, Forensic DNA Databases : The Co-Production of Law and Surveillance Technology.
Added to index2011-05-12
Total downloads11 ( #107,331 of 722,704 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,704 )
How can I increase my downloads?