Has the brain evolved to answer “binding questions” or to generate likely hypotheses about complex and continuously changing environments?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):75-76 (2006)
|Abstract||We question the ecological plausibility as a general model of cognition of van der Velde's & de Kamps's combinatorial blackboard architecture, where knowledge-binding in space and time relies on the structural rules of language. Evidence against their view of the brain and an ecologically plausible, alternative model of cognition are brought forward.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ralph-Axel Müller (2006). Blackboards in the Brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):81-81.
Frank van der Velde & Marc de Kamps (2006). Neural Blackboard Architectures of Combinatorial Structures in Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):37-70.
Bernard J. Baars (2006). Conscious Cognition and Blackboard Architectures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):70-71.
Colin Phillips & Matthew Wagers (2006). Constituent Structure and the Binding Problem. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):81-82.
Rens Bod, Hartmut Fitz & Willem Zuidema (2006). On the Structural Ambiguity in Natural Language That the Neural Architecture Cannot Deal With. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):71-72.
Nick Bostrom, Cortical Integration: Possible Solutions to the Binding and Linking Problems in Perception, Reasoning and Long Term Memory.
Leonidas A. A. Doumas, Keith J. Holyoak & John E. Hummel (2006). The Problem with Using Associations to Carry Binding Information. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):74-75.
Robert F. Hadley (2006). Neural Circuits, Matrices, and Conjunctive Binding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):80-80.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #188,662 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?