|Abstract||To understand why Kierkegaard would have hated the Internet we need to understand what he meant by the Public and why he was so opposed to the Press. The focus of his concern was what Habermas calls the public sphere which, in the middle of the 18th century, thanks to the recent democratization and expansion of the press, had become a serious problem for many intellectuals. But while thinkers like Mill and Tocqueville thought the problem was "the tyranny of the masses", Kierkegaard thought that the Public Sphere, as implemented in the Press, promoted risk-free anonymity and idle curiosity that undermined responsibility and commitment. This, in turn, leveled all qualitative distinctions and led to nihilism, he held.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Hubert L. Dreyfus (2002). Anonymity Versus Commitment: The Dangers of Education on the Internet. Educational Philosophy and Theory 34 (4):369–378.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (1999). Anonymity Versus Commitment: The Dangers of Education on the Internet. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):369-378.
Hubert Dreyfus & Jane Rubin (1994). Kierkegaard on the Nihilism of the Present Age: The Case of Commitment as Addiction. Synthese 98 (1):3 - 19.
Hubert L. Dreyfus & Jane Rubin (1987). You Can't Get Something for Nothing: Kierkegaard and Heidegger on How Not to Overcome Nihilism. Inquiry 30 (1 & 2):33 – 75.
Brian T. Prosser & Andrew Ward (2000). Kierkegaard and the Internet: Existential Reflections on Education and Community. Ethics and Information Technology 2 (3):167-180.
Brad Frazier (2006). Rorty and Kierkegaard on Irony and Moral Commitment: Philosophical and Theological Connections. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jeremy Walker (1969). Kierkegaard's Concept of Truthfulness. Inquiry 12 (1-4):209 – 224.
Christopher A. P. Nelson (2006). Kierkegaard, Mysticism, and Jest: The Story of Little Ludvig. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (4):435-464.
Harrison Hall (1984). Love, and Death: Kierkegaard and Heidegger on Authentic and Inauthentic Human Existence. Inquiry 27 (1-4):179 – 197.
Michael Plekon (2000). Kierkegaard at the End. Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):68-86.
Will C. van den Hoonaard (2003). Is Anonymity an Artifact in Ethnographic Research? Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):141-151.
Kathleen A. Wallace (1999). Anonymity. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):21-31.
Patrick Goold (1990). Reading Kierkegaard. Faith and Philosophy 7 (3):304-315.
George Pattison (2002). Kierkegaard, Religion, and the Nineteenth-Century Crisis of Culture. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads52 ( #19,968 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,722 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?