Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (1) (1989)
|Abstract||Merit review of scientific projects involving laboratory animals is a central issue in the current debate over the ethics of animal experimentation. In this essay, I examine several conceptual, regulatory, and practical problems inherent in the merit review process. Contemporary challenges to the existing merit review system and suggestions for reform are also discussed. The essay concludes with comments on legal and political questions relevant to the future of merit assessment.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Diana Hicks & J. Katz (2011). Equity and Excellence in Research Funding. Minerva 49 (2):137-151.
Saul Smilansky (1997). Should I Be Grateful to You for Not Harming Me? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3):585 - 597.
Saul Smilansky (1997). Should I Be Grateful to You for Not Harming Me? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3):585-597.
Catherine Wilson (2003). The Role of a Merit Principle in Distributive Justice. Journal of Ethics 7 (3):277-314.
Wilfried Ver Eecke (2007). The Concept of Merit Good in Economic Theory. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:181-186.
Warren Thorngate (2009). Judging Merit. Psychology Press.
Evan Simpson & Karen Wendling (2005). Equality and Merit: A Merit-Based Argument for Equity Policies in Higher Education. Educational Theory 55 (4):385-398.
Rebecca Dresser (1988). Standards for Animal Research: Looking at the Middle. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):123-143.
Tommi Lehtonen (2000). The Notion of Merit in Indian Religions. Asian Philosophy 10 (3):189 – 204.
Denise Russell (1997). Animal Experimentation in Psychology and the Question of Scientific Merit. Ethics and the Environment 2 (1):43 - 52.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #99,650 of 549,753 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,753 )
How can I increase my downloads?