Graduate studies at Western
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (3):373 – 393 (2005)
|Abstract||First order logic does not distinguish between different forms of universal generalization; in this paper I argue that lawlike and accidental generalizations (broadly construed) have a different logical form, and that this distinction is syntactically marked in English. I then consider the relevance of this broader conception of lawlikeness to the philosophy of science.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John MacFarlane, Logical Constants. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
C. Z. Elgin (1980). Lawlikeness and the End of Science. Philosophy of Science 47 (1):56-68.
Oswaldo Chateaubriand (2000). Logical Forms. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:161-182.
C. Kenneth Waters (1998). Causal Regularities in the Biological World of Contingent Distributions. Biology and Philosophy 13 (1):5-36.
S. L. Zabell (1996). Confirming Universal Generalizations. Erkenntnis 45 (2-3):267 - 283.
Jani Raerinne (2011). Allometries and Scaling Laws Interpreted as Laws: A Reply to Elgin. Biology and Philosophy 26 (1):99-111.
Christopher Menzel (1998). Logical Form. In Edward Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2009). The Logic of Valuing. In Thomas Boylan & Ruvin Gekker (eds.), Economics, Rational Choice and Normative Philosophy. Routledge.
James H. Fetzer (1974). The Likeness of Lawlikeness. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974:377 - 391.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads85 ( #10,801 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)45 ( #1,537 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?