What must actions be for reasons to explain them?
In Constantine Sandis (ed.), New Essays on the Explanation of Action. Palgrave Macmillan (2009)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJulia Markovits (2010). Acting for the Right Reasons. Philosophical Review 119 (2):201-242.
Ferenc Huoranszki (2006). Reasons and Passions. Acta Analytica 21 (2):41-53.
Kalle Grill (2007). The Normative Core of Paternalism. Res Publica 13 (4).
Clayton Littlejohn (2009). ‘Ought’, ‘Can’, and Practical Reasons. American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (4):363-73.
Bill Pollard (2003). Can Virtuous Actions Be Both Habitual and Rational? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (4):411-425.
Theodore Mischel (1966). Pragmatic Aspects of Explanation. Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):40-60.
Jason Dickenson (2007). Reasons, Causes, and Contrasts. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (1):1–23.
James Lenman, Reasons for Action: Justification Vs. Explanation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-09-15Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
