David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 19 (4):507 – 526 (2006)
Geoffrey Miller argues that we can account for the evolution of human art and altruism via the action of sexual selection. He identifies five characteristics supposedly unique to sexual adaptations: fitness indicating cost; involvement in courtship; heritability; variability; and sexual differentiation. Miller claims that art and altruism possess these characteristics. I argue that not only does he not demonstrate that art and altruism possess these characteristics, one can also explain the origins of altruism via a form of group selection and traits with the five characteristics in terms of a process I call "cultural sexual selection.".
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jerome Barkow, Leda Cosmides & John Tooby (eds.) (1992). The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford University Press.
Elliott Sober & David Sloan Wilson (1998). Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Harvard University Press.
Robert Trivers (1971). The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46 (1):35-57.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Helen Cronin (1995). The Ant and the Peacock: Altruism and Sexual Selection From Darwin to Today. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (1):122-138.
Chris Haufe (2008). Sexual Selection and Mate Choice in Evolutionary Psychology. Biology and Philosophy 23 (1):115-128.
E. A. Grosz (2011). Becoming Undone: Darwinian Reflections on Life, Politics, and Art. Duke University Press.
Samir Okasha (2005). Altruism, Group Selection and Correlated Interaction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):703-725.
Tom Walker (2008). Could Sexual Selection Have Made Us Psychological Altruists. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 39 (1):153-162.
Mohan Matthen (2011). Art, Sexual Selection, Group Selection (Critical Notice of Denis Dutton, The Art Instinct). Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):337-356.
Jan Verpooten & Mark Nelissen, Sensory Exploitation: Underestimated in the Evolution of Art as Once in Sexual Selection Theory?
Grant Ramsey & Robert Brandon (2011). Why Reciprocal Altruism is Not a Kind of Group Selection. Biology and Philosophy 26 (3):385-400.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #146,256 of 1,696,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #246,076 of 1,696,514 )
How can I increase my downloads?