In Alfred Driessen & Antoine Suarez (eds.), Mathematical undecidability, quantum nonlocality, and the question of the existence of God. Springer (1997)
|Abstract||The continuing interest in the book of S. Hawking "A Brief History of Time" makes a philosophical evaluation of the content highly desirable. As will be shown, the genre of this work can be identified as a speciality in philosophy, namely the proof of the existence of God. In this study an attempt is given to unveil the philosophical concepts and steps that lead to the final conclusions, without discussing in detail the remarkable review of modern physical theories. In order to clarify these concepts, the classical Aristotelian-Thomistic proof of the existence of God is presented and compared with Hawking's approach. For his argumentation he uses a concept of causality, which in contrast to the classical philosophy neglects completely an ontological dependence and is reduced to only temporal aspects. On the basis of this temporal causality and modern physical theories and speculations, Hawking arrives at his conclusions about a very restricted role of a possible creator. It is shown, that neither from the philosophical nor the scientific view his conclusions about the existence of God are strictly convincing, a position Hawking himself seems to be aware of.|
|Keywords||Hawking Aristotle philosophy of science proof of the existence of God causality in physics cosmology|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alfred Driessen (1997). The Question of the Existence of God in the Book of Stephen Hawking: A Brief History of Time. In Alfred Driessen & Antoine Suarez (eds.), Mathematical undecidability, quantum nonlocality, and the question of the existence of God. Springer.
Alfred Driessen (1995). The Question of the Existence of God in the Book of Stephen Hawking: A Brief History of Time. Acta Philosophica 4:83-93.
Quentin Smith (1998). Swinburne's Explanation of the Universe. Religious Studies 34 (1):91-102.
Richard Messer (1993). Does God's Existence Need Proof? Oxford University Press.
David Twetten (2006). On Which 'God' Should Be the Target of a 'Proof of God's Existence'. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:75-80.
Robert J. Spitzer (2010). New Proofs for the Existence of God: Contributions of Contemporary Physics and Philosophy. William B. Eerdmans Pub..
David Braine (1988). The Reality of Time and the Existence of God: The Project of Proving God's Existence. Oxford University Press.
Gregg H. Rosenberg (1999). On the Intrinsic Nature of the Physical. In Stuart R. Hameroff, Alfred W. Kaszniak & A. C. Scott (eds.), Toward a Science of Consciousness III. MIT Press.
G. Belot, J. Earman & and L. Ruetsche (1999). The Hawking Information Loss Paradox: The Anatomy of Controversy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (2):189-229.
Lydia Schumacher (2011). The Lost Legacy of Anselm's Argument: Re-Thinking the Purpose of Proofs for the Existence of God. Modern Theology 27 (1):87 - 101.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-25
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?