Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and Globalization
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Gili S. Drori (ed.)
Stanford University Press (2003)
This book presents empirical studies of the rise, expansion, and influence of scientific discourse and organization throughout the world, over the past century. Using quantitative cross-national data, it shows the impact of this scientized world polity on national societies. It examines how this world scientific system and national reflections of it have influenced a wide variety of institutional spheres—the economy, political systems, human rights, environmentalism, and organizational reforms. The authors argue that the triumph of science across social domains and around the world is due to its institutionalized cultural authority rather than to its instrumental utility for societies or for their dominant elites. Thus, following the Stanford approach to institutional theory in sociology, the book emphasizes the symbolic or religious role science plays in the modern world.
|Keywords||Science Social aspects Science and state|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$75.95 new (6% off) $76.17 used (5% off) $79.95 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||Q175.5.S3643 2003|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
Christine Min Wotipka & Francisco O. Ramirez, Women in Science: For Development, for Human Rights, for Themselves.
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Alberto Artosi (2010). Please Don't Use Science or Mathematics in Arguing for Human Rights or Natural Law. Ratio Juris 23 (3):311-332.
Richard Münch & Christian Baier (2012). Institutional Struggles for Recognition in the Academic Field: The Case of University Departments in German Chemistry. [REVIEW] Minerva 50 (1):97-126.
Neil Gross & Ethan Fosse (2012). Why Are Professors Liberal? Theory and Society 41 (2):127-168.
Richard Whitley (2011). Changing Governance and Authority Relations in the Public Sciences. Minerva 49 (4):359-385.
Ronald Jepperson & John W. Meyer (2011). Multiple Levels of Analysis and the Limitations of Methodological Individualisms. Sociological Theory 29 (1):54 - 73.
Similar books and articles
Lisa Randall (2011). Knocking on Heaven's Door: How Physics and Scientific Thinking Illuminate the Universe and the Modern World. Ecco.
Gregoire Mallard, Catherine Paradeise & Ashveen Peerbaye (eds.) (2008). Global Science and National Sovereignty: Studies in Historical Sociology of Science. Routledge.
Morris Berman (1981). The Reenchantment of the World. Cornell University Press.
Mohd Hazim Shah (2007). The Rise of Paradigmatic Monism and Its Cultural Implications. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:81-86.
Alan Irwin & Brian Wynne (eds.) (1996). Misunderstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge University Press.
Martin Bridgstock (ed.) (1998). Science, Technology, and Society: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Lennart Hasselgren (1990). Reflections on the Role of Basic Sciences in Third World Countries. Swedish Agency for Research Cooperation with Developing Countries.
Massimiano Bucchi (2004). Science in Society: An Introduction to Social Studies of Science. Routledge.
Alan Irwin (2003). Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. Open University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #468,102 of 1,168,113 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #140,420 of 1,168,113 )
How can I increase my downloads?