Graduate studies at Western
Environmental Ethics 12 (3):195-210 (1990)
|Abstract||Exclusively instrumental notions of rationality not only reinforce attitudes conducive to the destruction of the natural world, but also undermine attempts to construct environmental ethics that involve more harmonious relationships between humans and nature. Deep ecologists and other ecological critics of instrumental rationality generally prefer some kind of spiritual orientation to nature. In this paper I argue against both instrumental rationalists and ecological spiritualists in favor of a communicative rationality which encompasses the natural world. I draw upon both critical theory and recent scientific intimations of agency in nature|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert Elliot (2005). Instrumental Value in Nature as a Basis for the Intrinsic Value of Nature as a Whole. Environmental Ethics 27 (1):43-56.
Tatjana Kochetkova (2005). On the Intellectual Origins of the Ecological Crisis: Towards a Gestalt Solution. Ethics, Place and Environment 8 (1):95 – 111.
Kevin DeLuca (2001). Rethinking Critical Theory: Instrumental Reason, Judgment, and the Environmental Crisis. Environmental Ethics 23 (3):307-325.
Robert V. Bartlett (1986). Ecological Rationality: Reason and Environmental Policy. Environmental Ethics 8 (3):221-239.
Ali Mesbah, Religion, Rationality, and Language : A Critical Analysis of Jürgen Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action.
John S. Dryzek (1990). Green Reason. Environmental Ethics 12 (3):195-210.
Ralph Wedgwood (2011). Instrumental Rationality. Oxford Studies in Metaethics 6:280-309.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,476 of 739,539 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,539 )
How can I increase my downloads?