How are social-scientific concepts formed? A reconstruction of Max Weber's theory of concept formation
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sociological Theory 14 (1):71-88 (1996)
Recent interpretations of Weber's theory of concept formation have concluded that it is seriously defective and therefore of questionable use in social science. Oakes and Burger have argued that Weber's ideas depend upon Rickert's epistemology, whose arguments Oakes finds to be invalid; by implication, Weber's theory fails. An attempt is made to reconstruct Weber's theory on the basis of his 1904 essay on objectivity. Pivotal to Weber's theory is his distinction between concept and judgment (hypothesis), where the former is the interpretive means to the formation of explanatory accounts (judgments). His theory includes criteria of abstraction and synthesis in the construction of ideal-type concepts as well as criteria for their evaluation. Weber provides a reasonably coherent, if incomplete, theory of concept formation which does not depend on Rickert's epistemological arguments
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Badredine Arfi (2010). Auto-Immunity of Trust Without Trust. Journal of International Political Theory 6 (2):188-216.
Similar books and articles
Kurt H. Wolff (1980). Max Weber's Theory of Concept Formation: History, Laws, and Ideal Types. Journal of the History of Philosophy 18 (1):103-106.
Wolfgang J. Mommsen (1989). The Political and Social Theory of Max Weber: Collected Essays. University of Chicago Press.
Heinrich Rickert (1986). The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science: A Logical Introduction to the Historical Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
Wolfgang Schluchter (1996). Paradoxes of Modernity: Culture and Conduct in the Theory of Max Weber. Stanford University Press.
Hans Henrik Bruun (2008). Objectivity, Value Spheres, and "Inherent Laws": On Some Suggestive Isomorphisms Between Weber, Bourdieu, and Luhmann. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (1):97-120.
Giovanni Camardi (2004). Ideal Types and Scientific Theories. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):273-285.
L. B. Cebik (1978). Book Reviews : Max Weber's Theory of Concept Formation. By Thomas Burger. Durham: Duke University Press, 1976. Pp. XVII + 231. $9.75. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 8 (1):101-106.
Guy Oakes (1988). Rickert's Value Theory and the Foundations of Weber's Methodology. Sociological Theory 6 (1):38-51.
Asaf Kedar (2007). Ideal Types as Hermeneutic Concepts. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (3):318-345.
Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn (1997). Webers Idealtypus AlS Methode Zur Bestimmung Des Begriffsinhaltes Theoretischer Begriffe in den Kulturwissenschaften. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (2):275 - 296.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #121,682 of 1,907,621 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #273,183 of 1,907,621 )
How can I increase my downloads?