|Abstract||Jonathan Aldred shares our desire to promote a reconciliation between social choice theory and deliberative democracy in the interests of a more comprehensive and compelling account of democracy.1 His comments on some details of our analysis – specifically, our use of Arrow’s conditions of universal domain and independence of irrelevant alternatives – give us an opportunity to clarify our position. His discussion of the independence condition in particular identifies some ambiguity in our exposition, and as such is useful. We are less impressed by the way Aldred characterizes the overall terms of the reconciliation we propose. We believe that his argument on this matter should be resisted because it provides deliberative democrats with a bad excuse to dismiss social choice theory altogether, which is surely not what he intends.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Ranjoo Seodu Herr (2008). Cultural Claims and the Limits of Liberal Democracy. Social Theory and Practice 34 (1):25-48.
M. Bacon (2010). The Politics of Truth: A Critique of Peircean Deliberative Democracy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (9):1075-1091.
Bashir Bashir (2012). Reconciling Historical Injustices: Deliberative Democracy and the Politics of Reconciliation. [REVIEW] Res Publica 18 (2):127-143.
Charles Blattberg (2003). Patriotic, Not Deliberative, Democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):155-174.
Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij (2012). Why Deliberative Democracy is (Still) Untenable. Public Affairs Quarterly 26 (3).
Joshua Cohen (2009). Philosophy, Politics, Democracy: Selected Essays. Harvard University Press.
James Fishkin (2005). Defending Deliberation: A Comment on Ian Shapiro's The State of Democratic Theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (1):71-78.
John S. Dryzek (2005). Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia. Political Theory 33 (2):218 - 242.
Jonathan Aldred (2002). It's Good to Talk: Deliberative Institutions for Environmental Policy. Philosophy and Geography 5 (2):133 – 152.
Added to index2010-07-25
Total downloads20 ( #68,257 of 722,928 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,928 )
How can I increase my downloads?