David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Apeiron 40 (3):267-318 (2007)
The paper proposes a novel understanding of how Aristotle’s theoretical works complement each other in such a way as to form a genuine system, and this with the immediate (and ostensibly central) aim of addressing a longstanding question regarding Aristotle’s ‘first philosophy’—namely, is Aristotle’s first philosophy a contribution to theology, or to the science of being in general? Aristotle himself seems to suggest that it is in some ways both, but how this can be is a very difficult question. My answer is in some respects a version of one that goes back at least to the middle ages—i.e., that first philosophy is concerned with the gods (and to that extent offers a theology) because the gods are causes and principles of beings precisely insofar as they are beings. The more original aspect of my position lies in my claim that the sort of tension found in the Metaphysics is likewise to be found in many of Aristotle’s physical works. Thus, for example, the De caelo is (I argue) concerned generally with natural beings (= beings susceptible of change), but its discussions are focused largely on the heavenly bodies and the Aristotelian elements insofar as they admit of change with respect to place. Here I claim that the particular objects of discussion are dealt with precisely because they are causes and principles of natural beings as such. Something similar goes, I claim, for the De generatione et corruptione, the general concern of which is a particular species of natural being—i.e., natural beings susceptible of generation and corruption. In this way, I argue, Aristotle successively deals in his theoretical works with those causes and principles of (say) a horse which attach to it insofar as it is a being, those causes and principles of a horse which attach to it insofar as it is a natural being, those causes and principles of a horse which attach to it insofar as it is a perishable natural being, and so on for the lower genera under which the species horse is subsumed.
|Keywords||Aristotle Metaphysics Being qua being Theology Natural philosophy De Caelo De Generatione et Corruptione Meteorologica|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Enrico Berti (2001). Multiplicity and Unity of Being in Aristotle. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (2):185–207.
Walter D. Ludwig (1989). Aristotle's Conception of the Science of Being. New Scholasticism 63 (4):379-404.
Kyle Fraser (2002). Demonstrative Science and the Science of Being Qua Being. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 23:43-81.
Gérard Verbeke (1979). La Physique d'Aristote est-elle une ontologie? Pensamiento 35 (138/139):171.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Edward S. Forster (1923). Aristotle de Caelo and de Generatione Et Corruptione The Works of Aristotle Translated Into English: De Caelo. By J. L. Stocks, M.A., D.S.O.; De Generatione Et Corruptione. By Professor H. H. Joachim. Two Parts in One. 225 × 145 Mm. Oxford, at the Clarendon Press, 1922. 10s. Net. Aristotle on 'Coming-to-Be' and 'Passingaway' (de Generatione Et Corruptione). A Revised Text, with Introduction and Commentary. By Harold H. Joachim, Wykeham Professor of Logic in the University of Oxford. One Vol. 235 × 145 Mm. Preface, Etc., Pp. Xxxviii; Texts, Notes, and Indices, Pp. 303. Oxford, at the Clarendon Press, 1922. 32s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 37 (1-2):44-45.
James Bogen & J. E. McGuire (1986). Aristotle's Great Clock. Philosophy Research Archives 12:387-448.
Allan Bäck (2004). What is Being Qua Being? Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):37-58.
Aristotle (1942). The Student's Oxford Aristotle. New York [Etc.]Oxford University Press.
Mohan Matthen (2009). Why Does Earth Move to the Center? An Examination of Some Explanatory Strategies in Aristotle's Cosmology. In Alan C. Bowen & Christian Wildberg (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle's De Caelo. Brill 1--119.
Christopher V. Mirus (2012). Aristotle on Beauty and Goodness in Nature. International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (1):79-97.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2008). The Aristotelian Method and Aristotelian Metaphysics. In Patricia Hanna (ed.), An Anthology of Philosophical Studies. ATINER
Christopher P. Long (2007). Aristotle's Phenomenology of Form: The Shape of Beings That Become. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):435-448.
Mariska Elisabeth Maria Philomena Johannes Leunissen, Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle's Philosophy of Nature.
Adam Wood (2012). Incorporeal Nous and the Science of the Soul in Aristotle's De Anima. International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2):169-182.
Tim Loughlin (2011). Souls and the Location of Time in Physics IV 14, 223a16–223a29. Apeiron 4 (4):307-325.
Added to index2010-11-27
Total downloads83 ( #42,950 of 1,780,829 )
Recent downloads (6 months)30 ( #25,665 of 1,780,829 )
How can I increase my downloads?