David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studia Leibnitiana 41 (1):67-87 (2009)
A number of recent studies have called into question the traditional interpretation of Leibniz as an idealist beginning, at the latest, with the composition of the Discourse on Metaphysics (1686). In particular, in a recent book Daniel Garber affirms that between the late 1670s and late 1690s Leibniz maintains a realist doctrine according to which the created world is populated with extended corporeal substances. In trying to prove his thesis, Garber appeals to a document written in 1690 where Leibniz, addressing an objection by Michelangelo Fardella, denies that bodies are composed of souls, declares that souls are substantial forms, and affirms that bodies are composed instead of substances. According to Garber, this shows that Leibniz then believed that bodies were composed, not of simple substances, but of extended substances possessing souls. Here I try to show that, to the contrary, the mentioned document (along with two others closely associated with it) support the traditional interpretation of Leibniz as an idealist in 1690.
|Keywords||Daniel Garber Idealism Realism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daniel Garber (2009). Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. Oxford University Press.
Stephen Puryear (2010). Review of Daniel Garber, Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (8).
Paul Lodge (2005). Garber's Interpretations of Leibniz on Corporeal Substance in the 'Middle Years'. The Leibniz Review 15:1-26.
Jeffrey K. McDonough, Comments on Daniel Garber's Metaphysics and Theology: The Role of the Monadology in Leibniz's Essais de Théodicée.
Brandon C. Look (2010). Leibniz's Metaphysics and Metametaphysics: Idealism, Realism, and the Nature of Substance. Philosophy Compass 5 (11):871-879.
Daniel Garber (2000). Notice of Christia Mercer, Leibniz's Metaphysics: Its Origin and Development. The Leibniz Review 10:149-150.
Jeffrey K. McDonough (2010). Leibniz and the Puzzle of Incompossibility: The Packing Strategy. Philosophical Review 119 (2):135-163.
Rebecca J. Lloyd (2008). Situating Time in the Leibnizian Hierarchy of Beings. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):245-260.
Samuel Levey (2007). On Unity and Simple Substance in Leibniz. The Leibniz Review 17:61-106.
Daniel Garber (1995). Leibniz: Physics and Philosophy. In Nicholas Jolley (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Cambridge University Press 270--352.
Andreas Blank (2003). Incomplete Entities, Natural Non-Separability, and Leibniz's Response to François Lamy's De la Conoissance de Soi-Même. The Leibniz Review 13:1-17.
Justin E. H. Smith (2003). Confused Perception and Corporeal Substance in Leibniz. The Leibniz Review 13:45-64.
Andrew D. H. Stumpf (2012). Harmonizing Leibniz's Ontology. Dialogue 51 (3):467-483.
Daniel Garber (2004). Leibniz on Body, Matter and Extension. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 78 (1):23–40.
Added to index2011-06-19
Total downloads21 ( #189,356 of 1,935,135 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #196,228 of 1,935,135 )
How can I increase my downloads?