David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (1):37-66 (2005)
Some critics raise moral objections against corporate social responsibility on account of its supposedly undemocratic nature. Theyargue that it is hard to reconcile democracy with the private discretion that always accompanies the discharge of responsibilities that are not judicially enforceable. There are two ways of constructing this argument: the “perfect-market argument” and the “social-power argument.” This paper demonstrates that the perfect-market argument is untenable and that the social-power argument is sometimes valid. It also asserts that the proponents of the perfect-market argument are mistaken in their assumption that perfect markets are conducive to democracy. There are strong reasons to hold that perfect markets are undesirable from a democratic point of view. A proper conceptualization and differentiation of the relation between “the private and the public” can make this clear. The proponents of the social-power argument sometimes maintain that the democratic deficit can be compensated for by consulting the stakeholdersaffected. Against this, I will argue that the social power argument has nothing to offer affected parties. Still, it will be shown that moderntheory on corporate social responsibility is not well accommodated to the democratic deficit as revealed by the social power argument
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Subhabrata Bobby Banerjee (2010). Governing the Global Corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (2):265-274.
Rutger Claassen (2011). Communication as Commodity: Should the Media Be on the Market? Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):65-79.
Waheed Hussain (2012). Corporations, Profit Maximization and the Personal Sphere. Economics and Philosophy 28 (3):311-331.
Moses L. Pava (2008). Why Corporations Should Not Abandon Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (4):805 - 812.
Dale Jacquette (1994). Wittgenstein on Private Language and Privat Mental Objects. Wittgenstein Studien 1 (1).
Roger Harris (2007). The Private Language Argument Isn't as Difficult, Nor as Dubious as Some Make Out. Sorites 18:98-108.
Re'em Segev (2011). Governmental Power: Quality or Identity? Comment on Alon Harel's Argument Against Outsourcing Violence. Law and Ethics of Human Rights 5 (2):416-423.
John Douglas Bishop (2008). For-Profit Corporations in a Just Society. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (2):191-212.
Jason Brennan (2013). Is Market Society Intrinsically Repugnant? Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2):271-281.
Marguerite Schneider & Alix Valenti (2008). The Effects of “Going Private” on Corporate Financial and Corporate Social Performance. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:236-245.
Francois-Igor Pris (forthcoming). Phenomenal Concepts are Consistent with Wittgenstein’s Private Language Argument (2012). NB: Philosophical Investigations (Russian E-Journal).
Karsten J. Struhl (2007). Is Democracy a Universal Value? Radical Philosophy Today 2007:3-24.
Richard Bellamy (2012). Rights as Democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (4):449-471.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?