David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (1):65--89 (2000)
The starting point of this work is the gap between two distinct traditions in information engineering: knowledge representation and data-driven modelling. The first tradition emphasizes logic as a tool for representing beliefs held by an agent. The second tradition claims that the main source of knowledge is made of observed data, and generally does not use logic as a modelling tool. However, the emergence of fuzzy logic has blurred the boundaries between these two traditions by putting forward fuzzy rules as a Janus-faced tool that may represent knowledge, as well as approximate non-linear functions representing data. This paper lays bare logical foundations of data-driven reasoning whereby a set of formulas is understood as a set of observed facts rather than a set of beliefs. Several representation frameworks are considered from this point of view: classical logic, possibility theory, belief functions, epistemic logic, fuzzy rule-based systems. Mamdani's fuzzy rules are recovered as belonging to the data-driven view. In possibility theory a third set-function, different from possibility and necessity plays a key role in the data-driven view, and corresponds to a particular modality in epistemic logic. A bi-modal logic system is presented which handles both beliefs and observations, and for which a completeness theorem is given. Lastly, our results may shed new light in deontic logic and allow for a distinction between explicit and implicit permission that standard deontic modal logics do not often emphasize.
|Keywords||data-driven reasoning deontic logic epistemic logic possibility theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard DeWitt (2005). On Retaining Classical Truths and Classical Deducibility in Many-Valued and Fuzzy Logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (5/6):545 - 560.
Thomas Vetterlein (2008). A Way to Interpret Łukasiewicz Logic and Basic Logic. Studia Logica 90 (3):407 - 423.
Petr Hájek & Petr Cintula (2006). On Theories and Models in Fuzzy Predicate Logics. Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (3):863 - 880.
Henri Prade (1996). New Trends and Open Problems in Fuzzy Logic and Approximate Reasoning. Theoria 11 (3):109-121.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #50,255 of 1,413,409 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #67,314 of 1,413,409 )
How can I increase my downloads?