The immaculate conception in the works of Peter auriol
Vivarium 38 (1):5-34 (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesChris Schabel (2000). Place, Space, and the Physics of Grace in Auriol's Sentences Commentary. Vivarium 38 (1):117-161.
Alessandro D. Conti (2000). Divine Ideas and Exemplar Causality in Auriol. Vivarium 38 (1):99-116.
Charles Bolyard (2000). Knowing Naturaliter: Auriol's Propositional Foundations. Vivarium 38 (1):162-176.
Walter Leszl (2004). Aristotle's Logical Works and His Conception of Logic. Topoi 23 (1):71-100.
Julian Dodd (2004). Types, Continuants, and the Ontology of Music. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):342-360.
Lauge O. Nielsen (2000). The Debate Between Peter Auriol and Thomas Wylton on Theology and Virtue. Vivarium 38 (1):35-98.
Brian Skyrms (1978). An Immaculate Conception of Modality or How to Confuse Use and Mention. Journal of Philosophy 75 (7):368-387.
Russell L. Friedman (2000). Peter Auriol on Intellectual Cognition of Singulars. Vivarium 38 (1):177-193.
Russell L. Friedman, Peter Auriol. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,748 of 549,113 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,113 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
