David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In this paper, I take up the question to what extent and in which sense we can conceive of Johannes Baptista Van Helmont’s (1579-1644) style of experimenting as “modern”. Connected to this question, I shall reflect upon what Van Helmont’s precise contribution to experimental practice was. I will argue - after analysing some of Van Helmont's experiments such as his tree-experiment, ice-experiment, and thermoscope experiment - that Van Helmont had a strong preference to locate experimental designs in places wherein variables can be more easily controlled (and in the limit, in relatively closed physical systems such as paradigmatically the vessel, globe or sphere (vas, globus, sphera)). After having reviewed some alternative candidates, I shall argue that Van Helmont’s usage of relatively isolated physical systems and a moderate degree of quantification, whereby mathematical procedures mainly refer to guaranteeing that quantities are conserved by roughly determining them, are the characteristics that best captures his contributions to “modern” experimentation.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
W. H. C. Frend (1969). H. W. A. van Rooijen-Dijkman. De Beata Vita: het zevende boek van de Divinae Institutiones van Lactantius. Analyse en bronnenonderzoek. Pp. 194. Assen: van Gorcum, 1967. Paper, fl. 17.90. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 19 (01):105-.
Ned Markosian (1998). Simples. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (2):213 – 228.
Marina Paola Banchetti-Robino (2011). Ontological Tensions in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Chemistry: Between Mechanism and Vitalism. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 13 (3):173-186.
Marina Paola Banchetti-Robino, Ontological Tensions in 16th and 17th Century Chemistry: Between Mechanism and Vitalism.
M. A. Stewart (ed.) (1997). Studies in Seventeenth-Century European Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Allison Coudert (1976). A Quaker-Kabbalist Controversy: George Fox's Reaction to Francis Mercury Van Helmont. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 39:171-189.
James J. Bono (1984). Review: The Ferment of Van Helmont's Ideas. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 17 (2):291 - 294.
William R. Newman (1993). The Corpuscular Theory of J. B. Van Helmont and its Medieval Sources. Vivarium 31 (1):161-191.
Francis Augustine Walsh (1937). Jean-Baptiste Van Helmont. New Scholasticism 11 (2):181-183.
Steffen Ducheyne (2008). J. B. Van Helmont's de Tempore as an Influence on Isaac Newton's Doctrine of Absolute Time. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90 (2):216-228.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #122,430 of 1,102,737 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #296,833 of 1,102,737 )
How can I increase my downloads?