Some comments on professor Nagel's latest remarks
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5 (3):338-340 (1945)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMichael Scriven (1962). Comments on Professor Grunbaum's Remarks at the Wesleyan Meeting. Philosophy of Science 29 (2):171-174.
C. J. Ducasse (1947). Some Comments on Professor Wild's Criticisms of My Views on Semiosis. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 8 (2):234-238.
Richard Rorty (1963). Comments on Professor Hartshorne's Paper: Comments. Journal of Philosophy 60 (21):606-608.
H. Margenau & E. P. Wigner (1962). Comments on Professor Putnam's Comments. Philosophy of Science 29 (3):292-293.
C. J. Ducasse (1945). Some Comments on Professor Sellars' "Knowing and Knowledge". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5 (3):345-347.
C. J. Ducasse (1961). Some Comments on Professor Dommeyer's Criticisms. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 21 (4):552-555.
Ernest Nagel (1945). Professor Ducasse's Criterion of Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5 (3):333-337.
Raphael van Riel (2011). Nagelian Reduction Beyond the Nagel Model. Philosophy of Science 78 (3):353-375.
C. J. Ducasse (1947). Some Comments on Professor Wild's Preceding Remarks. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 8 (2):242-244.
Daniel E. Flage (2009). Remarks on Grandi's Comments. Philosophia 37 (3).
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
