Graduate studies at Western
Bioethics 5 (1):57–66 (1991)
|Abstract||The Vatican’s position on in vitro fertilization (IVG), found in the ’Instruction on Bioethics’ (1987), is that all IVF is immoral, for it violates the normative procreative act of married spouses. The dilemma created is, if all instances of IVF are immoral, then God’s act in the Incarnation (granting the traditional doctrine) must also have been immoral. Conversely, if God’s act in the Incarnation was not immoral, then at least some cases of human IVF are not immoral either. A resolution is offered. Two diagrams are employed|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert A. Bagnato (1971). Two Saints and Vatican II. Thought 46 (2):271-280.
Sofia Kaliarnta, Jessica Nihlén-Fahlquist & Sabine Roeser (2011). Emotions and Ethical Considerations of Women Undergoing IVF-Treatments. HEC Forum 23 (4):281-293.
Brian Leftow (1995). Anselm on the Necessity of the Incarnation. Religious Studies 31 (2):167 - 185.
P. Schlenker (2010). Presuppositions and Local Contexts. Mind 119 (474):377-391.
Alejandro Rosas (2007). Beyond the Sociobiological Dilemma: Social Emotions and the Evolution of Morality. Zygon 42 (3):685-700.
Richard Swinburne (2011). The Coherence of the Chalcedonian Definition of the Incarnation. In A. Marmodoro & J. Hill (eds.), The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Oxford Up.
Noel Sheth (2002). Hindu Avatāra and Christian Incarnation: A Comparison. Philosophy East and West 52 (1):98-125.
Derrick Farnell (2005). God and Morality. Think 4 (10):43-52.
Jennifer A. Parks (1999). On the Use of IVF by Post-Menopausal Women. Hypatia 14 (1):77-96.
Anna Marmodoro & Jonathan Hill (eds.) (2011). The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Oxford University Press, USA.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #107,723 of 752,081 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,163 of 752,081 )
How can I increase my downloads?