Impure Reason

The Owl of Minerva 35 (1-2):25-48 (2003)
The primary aim of this paper is to investigate what Hegel means by “reason” and “rationality.” The paper identifies and interprets some of Hegel’s most significant claims concerning the content of these terms, paying particular attention to his claims regarding the relation of the rational and the irrational. The resulting understanding of Hegel’s account of reason is then used to develop an improved interpretation of Hegel’s assertion of the equivalence of the rational and the actual
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/owl2003351/25
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,707
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Robert Stern (2006). Hegel's Doppelsatz: A Neutral Reading. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):235-266.
Nikolas Kompridis (2000). So We Need Something Else for Reason to Mean. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 8 (3):271 – 295.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

4 ( #424,619 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.