Does Religion Matter to Owner-Manager Agency Costs? Evidence from China

Journal of Business Ethics 118 (2):319-347 (2013)
Abstract
In China, Buddhism and Taoism are two major religions. Using a sample of 10,363 firm-year observations from the Chinese stock market for the period of 2001–2010, I provide strong and robust evidence that religion (i.e., Buddhism and Taoism on the whole) is significantly negatively associated with owner-manager agency costs. In particular, using firm-level religion data measured by the number of religious sites within a radius of certain distance around a listed firm’s registered address, I find that religion is significantly negatively (positively) associated with expense ratio (asset utilization ratio), the positive (reverse) proxy for owner-manager agency costs. This finding is consistent with the following view: religiosity has remarkable effects on the way how an individual thinks and behaves, and thereof can curb managers from unethical business practices. Moreover, my findings suggest that the negative association between religion and owner-manager agency costs is attenuated for firms with strong external monitoring mechanisms such as higher Marketization and high-quality auditors. Furthermore, after separating Buddhism from Taoism, my finding indicates that above conclusions are only available for Buddhism, suggesting that different religions may have asymmetric influence on owner-manager agency costs. Above results are robust to various measures of religiosity and a variety of robustness checks
Keywords Religion  Buddhism  Taoism  Owner-manager agency costs  Expense ratio  Asset utilization ratio  External monitoring mechanisms  Business ethics  China
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,068
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
E. Eugene Arthur (1987). The Ethics of Corporate Governance. Journal of Business Ethics 6 (1):59 - 70.

View all 16 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Lara Buchak (2012). Can It Be Rational to Have Faith? In Jacob Chandler & Victoria Harrison (eds.), Probability in the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press. 225.
Thierry Meynard (2005). Religion and Its Modern Fate. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (4):483-497.
Dan Sperber (2004). Agency, Religion, and Magic. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):750-751.
Helen Steward (2009). Animal Agency. Inquiry 52 (3):217-231.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index

2012-12-07

Total downloads

1 ( #459,326 of 1,101,857 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #306,556 of 1,101,857 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.